Skip to main content

Evaluation of IPv6 Transition Mechanisms for Unmanaged Networks
draft-ietf-v6ops-unmaneval-03

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2004-06-29
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-06-28
03 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-06-28
03 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-06-28
03 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-06-24
03 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Amy Vezza
2004-06-24
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-06-24
03 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-06-24
03 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-06-24
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-06-24
03 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2004-06-23
03 David Kessens [Note]: 'Note: IESG red team' added by David Kessens
2004-06-23
03 Bill Fenner Telechat date was changed to 2004-06-24 from 2004-07-08 by Bill Fenner
2004-06-23
03 Ted Hardie State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation - Defer by Ted Hardie
2004-06-23
03 Ted Hardie State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Ted Hardie
2004-06-22
03 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot comment]
You say that "it is not clear that a combination of STUN and a bubble mechanism would have a technical advantage over a …
[Ballot comment]
You say that "it is not clear that a combination of STUN and a bubble mechanism would have a technical advantage over a solution specifically designed for automatic tunneling through NAT."  Is there a deployment advantage?  That is, are STUN servers already being deployed for NATs, and hence can be used for IPv6 transition, too?
2004-06-22
03 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-06-18
03 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-06-17
03 David Kessens
[Ballot comment]
After the last call was finished, I received the following comment from Fred Templin:

I just noticed that this document
fails to mention …
[Ballot comment]
After the last call was finished, I received the following comment from Fred Templin:

I just noticed that this document
fails to mention [ISATAP] as an applicable automatic tunnel mechanism
(without NAT traversal) for unmanaged networks.

[ISATAP] is needed for host-to-host and host-to-router interactions
within unmanaged networks - especially accross bridges, ND proxies,
multi-link subnets, etc.
2004-06-17
03 David Kessens Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-06-24 by David Kessens
2004-06-17
03 David Kessens State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Publication Requested by David Kessens
2004-06-17
03 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for David Kessens
2004-06-17
03 David Kessens Ballot has been issued by David Kessens
2004-06-17
03 David Kessens Created "Approve" ballot
2004-06-17
03 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-06-17
03 (System) Last call text was added
2004-06-17
03 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-06-08
03 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova
2004-06-03
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-unmaneval-03.txt
2004-05-20
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-unmaneval-02.txt
2004-02-09
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-unmaneval-01.txt
2003-06-27
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-unmaneval-00.txt