Skip to main content

Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol for IPv6
draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-08

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
08 (System) Notify list changed from vrrp-chairs@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
08 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sam Hartman
2007-09-06
08 (System) State Changes to Dead from AD is watching by system
2007-09-06
08 (System) Document has expired
2007-03-22
08 Bill Fenner State Changes to AD is watching from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Bill Fenner
2007-03-22
08 Bill Fenner WG wants to do a new WG and IETF Last Call.
2007-03-21
08 Bill Fenner State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from Approved-announcement to be sent by Bill Fenner
2007-03-21
08 Bill Fenner WG is discussing some late-arriving issues.
2007-03-21
08 Bill Fenner State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Bill Fenner
2007-03-21
08 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bill Fenner has been changed to Yes from No Objection by Bill Fenner
2007-03-11
08 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sam Hartman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Sam Hartman
2007-03-05
08 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2007-03-05
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-08.txt
2007-02-02
08 Bill Fenner
To: vrrp-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Status of draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec?

I saw that Bob was willing to give up the pen.
Have you found someone willing to pick …
To: vrrp-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Status of draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec?

I saw that Bob was willing to give up the pen.
Have you found someone willing to pick it up?
In particular, have you found someone willing to
do the security discussion that Sam requested?

Do you still want to pursue the issue of the
timers, if someone new has the pen?

Thanks,
  Bill
2006-08-07
08 Bill Fenner
Subject: Status of draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec?
Date: Mon, Aug 7 07:51:34
To: vrrp-chairs@tools.ietf.org

Hi,

  draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec has been waiting for an update
to talk about the …
Subject: Status of draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec?
Date: Mon, Aug 7 07:51:34
To: vrrp-chairs@tools.ietf.org

Hi,

  draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec has been waiting for an update
to talk about the interaction of VRRP with SEND for almost
a year now.  Would it be useful to try to arrange a meeting
between a VRRP expert and a SEND expert to get this to
happen?

Thanks,
  Bill
2006-07-21
08 Bill Fenner State Change Notice email list have been change to vrrp-chairs@tools.ietf.org from radia.perlman@sun.com, Mukesh.Gupta@nokia.com
2006-05-31
08 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Magnus Westerlund by Magnus Westerlund
2006-05-25
08 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Cullen Jennings by Cullen Jennings
2006-05-16
08 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ross Callon by Ross Callon
2006-03-29
08 Bill Fenner Shepherding AD has been changed to Bill Fenner from Alex Zinin
2005-08-31
08 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot comment]
[these review comments from Joel Halpern were made in July]

As Sam Hartman noted, the Security section does not mention Secure Neighbor Discovery.  …
[Ballot comment]
[these review comments from Joel Halpern were made in July]

As Sam Hartman noted, the Security section does not mention Secure Neighbor Discovery.  Given the tone of the section, some reference to SEND ought to be made.

As a minor matter, in the state machine (section 6.4) and a few other places the document is inconsistent about referring to
a single IPv6 address associated with the Virtual Router and multiple addresses.  I believe multiple addresses are intended, and the advertisement descriptions should be updated to reflect that.
2005-08-31
08 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2005-07-22
08 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-07-21
2005-07-21
08 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2005-07-21
08 (System) [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alex Zinin has been changed to discuss from yes by IESG Secretary
2005-07-21
08 (System) [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by IESG Secretary
2005-07-21
08 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2005-07-21
08 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2005-07-20
08 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2005-07-20
08 Mark Townsley
[Ballot comment]
I suppose it doesn't hurt anything to be in here, and it is more consistent with RFC2338 this way, but do we still …
[Ballot comment]
I suppose it doesn't hurt anything to be in here, and it is more consistent with RFC2338 this way, but do we still care about Token Ring for new documents these days? (I suppose Brian could help answer that question for me!)
2005-07-20
08 Sam Hartman
[Ballot discuss]
Section 10 is well written as a security considerations section.  Its
analysis seems correct for normal ND.  However I'm not sure it is …
[Ballot discuss]
Section 10 is well written as a security considerations section.  Its
analysis seems correct for normal ND.  However I'm not sure it is true
that with secure ND, authentication of VRRP is useless.  Either way,
section 10 should discuss the issue.  I'm not asking for
authentication to be added if it would be useful in the secure ND
case.  Instead I'm asking for the security discussion to be updated
and if it would be useful I'd like to know whether VRRP could be
extended in the future to add authentication.


In addition, no part of the document discusses secure ND and how it
interacts with a VRRP router acting as master.  Please confirm there
are no considerations.
2005-07-20
08 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman
2005-07-20
08 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2005-07-20
08 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley
2005-07-19
08 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2005-07-19
08 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2005-07-18
08 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-07-13
08 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alex Zinin
2005-07-13
08 Alex Zinin Ballot has been issued by Alex Zinin
2005-07-13
08 Alex Zinin Created "Approve" ballot
2005-07-13
08 Alex Zinin Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-07-21 by Alex Zinin
2005-07-13
08 Alex Zinin State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Alex Zinin
2005-06-17
08 Michelle Cotton
Last Call Comments:

13. IANA Considerations
Upon approval of this document the IANA will assign an IPv6 link-local scope multicast address (suggested assignment FF02:0:0:0:0:0:0:12) in …
Last Call Comments:

13. IANA Considerations
Upon approval of this document the IANA will assign an IPv6 link-local scope multicast address (suggested assignment FF02:0:0:0:0:0:0:12) in the following registry: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-multicast-addresses

IANA is also going to check with the multicast expert on these requested assignments.

The IANA will also reserve a block of IANA Ethernet unicast addresses from:
00-00-5E-00-02-00  to  00-00-5E-00-02-FF for VRRP for IPv6 in the following registry: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ethernet-numbers

For the ethernet block, would it be the next block in the following registry?

Dotted Decimal          Description Reference
----------------------- ------------------------------- ---------
000.000.000-000.000.255 Reserved [IANA]
000.001.000-000.001.255 Virtual Router Redundancy (VRRP) [RFC3768]
2005-06-16
08 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2005-06-02
08 Michael Lee Last call sent
2005-06-02
08 Michael Lee State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Michael Lee
2005-06-01
08 Alex Zinin Note field has been cleared by Alex Zinin
2005-06-01
08 Alex Zinin Last Call was requested by Alex Zinin
2005-06-01
08 Alex Zinin State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Alex Zinin
2005-06-01
08 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2005-06-01
08 (System) Last call text was added
2005-06-01
08 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2005-04-15
08 Alex Zinin State Changes to AD Evaluation from AD Evaluation::External Party by Alex Zinin
2005-02-21
08 Alex Zinin State Changes to AD Evaluation::External Party from AD Evaluation by Alex Zinin
2005-02-21
08 Alex Zinin [Note]: 'waiting for the impl report to be submitted' added by Alex Zinin
2004-11-02
08 Alex Zinin State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Alex Zinin
2004-10-22
08 Bill Fenner
From:
Subject: VRRPv3 draft ready for AD review
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:31:33 -0500
To: ,
Cc: , ,

Alex/Bill,

The WG Last Call …
From:
Subject: VRRPv3 draft ready for AD review
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:31:33 -0500
To: ,
Cc: , ,

Alex/Bill,

The WG Last Call on the VRRPv3 draft ended yesterday.

The chairs think that the draft is ready for your review.

Please review the draft and let us know your comments.

Regards
Radia & Mukesh
2004-10-22
08 Bill Fenner Draft Added by Bill Fenner in state Publication Requested
2004-09-30
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-07.txt
2004-02-16
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-06.txt
2003-07-02
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-05.txt
2003-05-28
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Cisco's Statement about IPR claimed in draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-04.txt
2003-05-21
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-04.txt
2002-12-06
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-03.txt
2002-03-04
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-02.txt
2001-11-27
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-01.txt
2001-10-24
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-00.txt