Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol for IPv6
draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-08
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2015-10-14
|
08 | (System) | Notify list changed from vrrp-chairs@ietf.org to (None) |
2012-08-22
|
08 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sam Hartman |
2007-09-06
|
08 | (System) | State Changes to Dead from AD is watching by system |
2007-09-06
|
08 | (System) | Document has expired |
2007-03-22
|
08 | Bill Fenner | State Changes to AD is watching from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Bill Fenner |
2007-03-22
|
08 | Bill Fenner | WG wants to do a new WG and IETF Last Call. |
2007-03-21
|
08 | Bill Fenner | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from Approved-announcement to be sent by Bill Fenner |
2007-03-21
|
08 | Bill Fenner | WG is discussing some late-arriving issues. |
2007-03-21
|
08 | Bill Fenner | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Bill Fenner |
2007-03-21
|
08 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bill Fenner has been changed to Yes from No Objection by Bill Fenner |
2007-03-11
|
08 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sam Hartman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Sam Hartman |
2007-03-05
|
08 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2007-03-05
|
08 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-08.txt |
2007-02-02
|
08 | Bill Fenner | To: vrrp-chairs@tools.ietf.org Subject: Status of draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec? I saw that Bob was willing to give up the pen. Have you found someone willing to pick … To: vrrp-chairs@tools.ietf.org Subject: Status of draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec? I saw that Bob was willing to give up the pen. Have you found someone willing to pick it up? In particular, have you found someone willing to do the security discussion that Sam requested? Do you still want to pursue the issue of the timers, if someone new has the pen? Thanks, Bill |
2006-08-07
|
08 | Bill Fenner | Subject: Status of draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec? Date: Mon, Aug 7 07:51:34 To: vrrp-chairs@tools.ietf.org Hi, draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec has been waiting for an update to talk about the … Subject: Status of draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec? Date: Mon, Aug 7 07:51:34 To: vrrp-chairs@tools.ietf.org Hi, draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec has been waiting for an update to talk about the interaction of VRRP with SEND for almost a year now. Would it be useful to try to arrange a meeting between a VRRP expert and a SEND expert to get this to happen? Thanks, Bill |
2006-07-21
|
08 | Bill Fenner | State Change Notice email list have been change to vrrp-chairs@tools.ietf.org from radia.perlman@sun.com, Mukesh.Gupta@nokia.com |
2006-05-31
|
08 | Magnus Westerlund | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Magnus Westerlund by Magnus Westerlund |
2006-05-25
|
08 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Cullen Jennings by Cullen Jennings |
2006-05-16
|
08 | Ross Callon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ross Callon by Ross Callon |
2006-03-29
|
08 | Bill Fenner | Shepherding AD has been changed to Bill Fenner from Alex Zinin |
2005-08-31
|
08 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot comment] [these review comments from Joel Halpern were made in July] As Sam Hartman noted, the Security section does not mention Secure Neighbor Discovery. … [Ballot comment] [these review comments from Joel Halpern were made in July] As Sam Hartman noted, the Security section does not mention Secure Neighbor Discovery. Given the tone of the section, some reference to SEND ought to be made. As a minor matter, in the state machine (section 6.4) and a few other places the document is inconsistent about referring to a single IPv6 address associated with the Virtual Router and multiple addresses. I believe multiple addresses are intended, and the advertisement descriptions should be updated to reflect that. |
2005-08-31
|
08 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter |
2005-07-22
|
08 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-07-21 |
2005-07-21
|
08 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2005-07-21
|
08 | (System) | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alex Zinin has been changed to discuss from yes by IESG Secretary |
2005-07-21
|
08 | (System) | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by IESG Secretary |
2005-07-21
|
08 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
2005-07-21
|
08 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2005-07-20
|
08 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
2005-07-20
|
08 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot comment] I suppose it doesn't hurt anything to be in here, and it is more consistent with RFC2338 this way, but do we still … [Ballot comment] I suppose it doesn't hurt anything to be in here, and it is more consistent with RFC2338 this way, but do we still care about Token Ring for new documents these days? (I suppose Brian could help answer that question for me!) |
2005-07-20
|
08 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot discuss] Section 10 is well written as a security considerations section. Its analysis seems correct for normal ND. However I'm not sure it is … [Ballot discuss] Section 10 is well written as a security considerations section. Its analysis seems correct for normal ND. However I'm not sure it is true that with secure ND, authentication of VRRP is useless. Either way, section 10 should discuss the issue. I'm not asking for authentication to be added if it would be useful in the secure ND case. Instead I'm asking for the security discussion to be updated and if it would be useful I'd like to know whether VRRP could be extended in the future to add authentication. In addition, no part of the document discusses secure ND and how it interacts with a VRRP router acting as master. Please confirm there are no considerations. |
2005-07-20
|
08 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman |
2005-07-20
|
08 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
2005-07-20
|
08 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley |
2005-07-19
|
08 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
2005-07-19
|
08 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
2005-07-18
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
2005-07-13
|
08 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alex Zinin |
2005-07-13
|
08 | Alex Zinin | Ballot has been issued by Alex Zinin |
2005-07-13
|
08 | Alex Zinin | Created "Approve" ballot |
2005-07-13
|
08 | Alex Zinin | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-07-21 by Alex Zinin |
2005-07-13
|
08 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Alex Zinin |
2005-06-17
|
08 | Michelle Cotton | Last Call Comments: 13. IANA Considerations Upon approval of this document the IANA will assign an IPv6 link-local scope multicast address (suggested assignment FF02:0:0:0:0:0:0:12) in … Last Call Comments: 13. IANA Considerations Upon approval of this document the IANA will assign an IPv6 link-local scope multicast address (suggested assignment FF02:0:0:0:0:0:0:12) in the following registry: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-multicast-addresses IANA is also going to check with the multicast expert on these requested assignments. The IANA will also reserve a block of IANA Ethernet unicast addresses from: 00-00-5E-00-02-00 to 00-00-5E-00-02-FF for VRRP for IPv6 in the following registry: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ethernet-numbers For the ethernet block, would it be the next block in the following registry? Dotted Decimal Description Reference ----------------------- ------------------------------- --------- 000.000.000-000.000.255 Reserved [IANA] 000.001.000-000.001.255 Virtual Router Redundancy (VRRP) [RFC3768] |
2005-06-16
|
08 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system |
2005-06-02
|
08 | Michael Lee | Last call sent |
2005-06-02
|
08 | Michael Lee | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Michael Lee |
2005-06-01
|
08 | Alex Zinin | Note field has been cleared by Alex Zinin |
2005-06-01
|
08 | Alex Zinin | Last Call was requested by Alex Zinin |
2005-06-01
|
08 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Alex Zinin |
2005-06-01
|
08 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2005-06-01
|
08 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2005-06-01
|
08 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2005-04-15
|
08 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to AD Evaluation from AD Evaluation::External Party by Alex Zinin |
2005-02-21
|
08 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to AD Evaluation::External Party from AD Evaluation by Alex Zinin |
2005-02-21
|
08 | Alex Zinin | [Note]: 'waiting for the impl report to be submitted' added by Alex Zinin |
2004-11-02
|
08 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Alex Zinin |
2004-10-22
|
08 | Bill Fenner | From: Subject: VRRPv3 draft ready for AD review Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:31:33 -0500 To: , Cc: , , Alex/Bill, The WG Last Call … From: Subject: VRRPv3 draft ready for AD review Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:31:33 -0500 To: , Cc: , , Alex/Bill, The WG Last Call on the VRRPv3 draft ended yesterday. The chairs think that the draft is ready for your review. Please review the draft and let us know your comments. Regards Radia & Mukesh |
2004-10-22
|
08 | Bill Fenner | Draft Added by Bill Fenner in state Publication Requested |
2004-09-30
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-07.txt |
2004-02-16
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-06.txt |
2003-07-02
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-05.txt |
2003-05-28
|
(System) | Posted related IPR disclosure: Cisco's Statement about IPR claimed in draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-04.txt | |
2003-05-21
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-04.txt |
2002-12-06
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-03.txt |
2002-03-04
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-02.txt |
2001-11-27
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-01.txt |
2001-10-24
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-00.txt |