RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Burst/Gap Loss Metric Reporting
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-12

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
12 (System) Notify list changed from xrblock-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss@ietf.org to (None)
2013-05-24
12 (System) RFC published
2013-05-24
12 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2013-05-22
12 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2013-05-06
12 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2013-04-19
12 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2013-04-19
12 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2013-04-18
12 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2013-04-18
12 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2013-04-18
12 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor
2013-04-18
12 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from RFC-Ed-Ack
2013-04-18
12 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from RFC-Ed-Ack
2013-04-18
12 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed
2013-04-18
12 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2013-04-18
12 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-04-18
12 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2013-04-14
12 Qin Wu New version available: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-12.txt
2013-04-11
11 Qin Wu New version available: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-11.txt
2013-04-11
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
The way requirements and validation requirements are set out in this document is hard to follow.  I suggest the following changes:

Section ...
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon Ballot comment text updated for Ted Lemon
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
The way requirements and validation requirements are set out in this document is hard to follow.  I suggest the following changes:

Section ...
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon Ballot comment text updated for Ted Lemon
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
The way requirements and validation requirements are set out in this document is hard to follow.  I suggest the following changes:

Section ...
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon Ballot comment text updated for Ted Lemon
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
The way requirements and validation requirements are set out in this document is hard to follow.  I suggest the following changes:

Section ...
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon Ballot comment text updated for Ted Lemon
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
The way requirements and validation requirements are set out in this document is hard to follow.  I suggest the following changes:

Section ...
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon Ballot comment text updated for Ted Lemon
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
The way requirements and validation requirements are set out in this document is hard to follow.  I suggest the following changes:

Section ...
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon Ballot comment text updated for Ted Lemon
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
The way requirements and validation requirements are set out in this document is hard to follow.  I suggest the following changes:

Section ...
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Lemon has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-04-11
10 Benoît Claise [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS, and answering my COMMENT.
2013-04-11
10 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-04-10
10 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing the DISCUSS comments.

We had a conversation in email about the contact info in 6.3. RFC 3611 did not ...
2013-04-10
10 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-04-10
10 Qin Wu New version available: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-10.txt
2013-04-10
09 Benoît Claise
[Ballot discuss]
Hi Qin,

Me again ;-)
During the last IETF, we work together (with Dan Romascanu) on using the RFC6390 template in
http://tools.ietf ...
2013-04-10
09 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
RTCP XR views a call as being divided into bursts, which are periods
  during which the loss rate is high enough to ...
2013-04-10
09 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2013-04-10
09 Jari Arkko [Ballot comment]
Still waiting for a Gen-ART review on this document. I have done an overview review of the document myself.
2013-04-10
09 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2013-04-10
09 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-04-09
09 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot comment]
if peet's discuss is cleared I have no other objections.
2013-04-09
09 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2013-04-09
09 Richard Barnes
[Ballot comment]
Couple of minor things, and one less minor:

In Section 1.1., "this draft" should be "this document" (hopefully, it won't be ...
2013-04-09
09 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2013-04-09
09 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-04-08
09 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-04-08
09 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- 2.1, "specific time-window" could maybe do with a reference
to RFC 6921?

- 3.2, sum of burst durations has a max of ...
2013-04-08
09 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-04-08
09 Ted Lemon
[Ballot discuss]
Section 3.3:

  The metrics described here are intended to be used as described in 
  this section, in conjunction with information ...
2013-04-08
09 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
Given the possibility of overflow of various values, particularly the sum of squares of burst durations, I was surprised to see that there ...
2013-04-08
09 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-04-08
09 Barry Leiba [Ballot comment]
I agree with Pete's DISCUSS.
2013-04-08
09 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-04-08
09 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
Section 3:

                                          ...
2013-04-08
09 Pete Resnick [Ballot comment]
6.3: The contact information should be "IETF", should it not?
2013-04-08
09 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2013-04-08
09 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2013-04-08
09 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot comment]
Did the performance metrics directorate review wrt  RFC 6390 happen in the meantime?
2013-04-08
09 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-04-05
09 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2013-04-05
09 Gonzalo Camarillo Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-04-11
2013-04-05
09 Gonzalo Camarillo State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2013-04-05
09 Gonzalo Camarillo Ballot has been issued
2013-04-05
09 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2013-04-05
09 Gonzalo Camarillo Created "Approve" ballot
2013-04-05
09 Gonzalo Camarillo Ballot writeup was changed
2013-03-21
09 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Chris Lonvick.
2013-03-21
09 Qin Wu New version available: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-09.txt
2013-03-15
08 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2013-03-11
08 Amanda Baber
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-08.txt.  Authors should review the comments and/or questions below.  Please report any inaccuracies and ...
2013-03-07
08 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Wassim Haddad
2013-03-07
08 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Chris Lonvick
2013-03-01
08 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA Review Needed
2013-03-01
08 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <xrblock@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf ...
2013-03-01
08 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2013-03-01
08 Gonzalo Camarillo Last call was requested
2013-03-01
08 Gonzalo Camarillo Ballot approval text was generated
2013-03-01
08 Gonzalo Camarillo Ballot writeup was generated
2013-03-01
08 Gonzalo Camarillo State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested
2013-03-01
08 Gonzalo Camarillo Last call announcement was generated
2013-02-19
08 Cindy Morgan
UPDATED:
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why
is this the proper type of ...
2013-01-23
08 Cindy Morgan
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why
is this the proper type of RFC ...
2013-01-23
08 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Dan Romascanu (dromasca@avaya.com) is the Document Shepherd.'
2013-01-23
08 Cindy Morgan Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard
2013-01-23
08 Cindy Morgan IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2013-01-17
08 Qin Wu New version available: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-08.txt
2012-12-21
07 Qin Wu New version available: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-07.txt
2012-12-04
06 Qin Wu New version available: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-06.txt
2012-11-29
05 Qin Wu New version available: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-05.txt
2012-10-10
04 Qin Wu New version available: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-04.txt
2012-07-29
03 Qin Wu New version available: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-03.txt
2012-07-09
02 Qin Wu New version available: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-02.txt
2012-01-18
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-01.txt
2011-10-17
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-00.txt