Signaling MNA Capabilities Using IGP
draft-ihlesong-mpls-mna-signaling-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Fabian Ihle , Xueyan Song , Michael Menth | ||
| Last updated | 2025-12-15 (Latest revision 2025-06-13) | ||
| Replaces | draft-ihle-song-mpls-mna-signaling | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document defines capabilities of nodes supporting MPLS Network Actions (MNA) and how to signal them using IS-IS and OSPF. The capabilities include the Readable Label Depth (RLD), supported network action opcodes, and the maximum sizes of differently scoped Network Action Sub-stacks (NAS), called the NAS_MLD. For IS-IS and OSPF signaling, sub-TLV encodings based on existing mechanisms to signal node- and link-specific capabilities are leveraged.
Authors
Fabian Ihle
Xueyan Song
Michael Menth
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)