Using Self-Delimiting Numeric Values in Protocols
draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv-09
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2011-03-24
|
09 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent. |
2011-03-21
|
09 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
2011-03-21
|
09 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2011-02-23
|
09 | (System) | New version available: draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv-09.txt |
2011-02-22
|
09 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2011-02-22
|
09 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2011-02-22
|
09 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2011-02-22
|
09 | Amy Vezza | Approval announcement text changed |
2011-02-22
|
09 | Amy Vezza | Approval announcement text changed |
2011-02-22
|
09 | Amy Vezza | Approval announcement text regenerated |
2011-02-22
|
09 | Amy Vezza | Ballot writeup text changed |
2011-02-17
|
09 | Cindy Morgan | Removed from agenda for telechat |
2011-02-17
|
09 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation. |
2011-02-17
|
09 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-02-17
|
09 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-02-17
|
09 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-02-16
|
09 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-02-16
|
09 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-02-16
|
09 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-02-16
|
09 | Amanda Baber | We understand that this document does not require any IANA actions. |
2011-02-15
|
09 | Peter Saint-Andre | [Ballot comment] The introduction states: One example of SDNVs being used outside of the DTN protocols is in Hixie's Web Socket protocol … [Ballot comment] The introduction states: One example of SDNVs being used outside of the DTN protocols is in Hixie's Web Socket protocol [I-D.hixie-thewebsocketprotocol], which includes a binary frame length indicator field identical to an SDNV. Referencing draft-hixie-thewebsocketprotocol-76 seems problematic, given that this individual I-D was superseded by draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol and the work of the IETF's HYBI WG. If this text is not really needed here, I would urge its removal to prevent confusion regarding the canonical documentation of the WebSocket protocol. |
2011-02-15
|
09 | Peter Saint-Andre | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-02-15
|
09 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-02-15
|
09 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-02-15
|
09 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot comment] I have one comment with my independent reader hat on. I was a little surprised, after several potential uses of SDNVs were described … [Ballot comment] I have one comment with my independent reader hat on. I was a little surprised, after several potential uses of SDNVs were described earlier in the document, to read: In general, it seems like the most promising use of SDNVs may be to define the Length field of a TLV structure to be an SDNV whose value is the length of the TLV's Value field. As previously discussed, this leverages the strengths of the SDNV format and limits the effects of its weaknesses. I was left wishing for a little more explanation of why the authors make this statement and wondering why the other potential uses for SDNVs were judged less promising. |
2011-02-15
|
09 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot comment] I have one comment with my independent reader hat on. I was a little surprised, after several potential uses of SDNVs were described … [Ballot comment] I have one comment with my independent reader hat on. I was a little surprised, after several potential uses of SDNVs were described earlier in the document, to read: In general, it seems like the most promising use of SDNVs may be to define the Length field of a TLV structure to be an SDNV whose value is the length of the TLV's Value field. As previously discussed, this leverages the strengths of the SDNV format and limits the effects of its weaknesses. I was left wishing for a little more explanation of why the authors make this statement and wondering why the other potential uses for SDNVs were judged less promising. |
2011-02-15
|
09 | Ralph Droms | Ballot writeup text changed |
2011-02-12
|
09 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ralph Droms |
2011-02-12
|
09 | Ralph Droms | Ballot has been issued |
2011-02-12
|
09 | Ralph Droms | Created "Approve" ballot |
2011-02-12
|
09 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2011-02-12
|
09 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2011-02-12
|
09 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2011-02-12
|
09 | Ralph Droms | Ballot writeup text changed |
2011-02-08
|
09 | Cindy Morgan | Status Date has been changed to 2011-02-08 from 2011-02-03 |
2011-02-03
|
09 | Ralph Droms | State changed to IESG Evaluation from Publication Requested. |
2011-02-03
|
09 | Ralph Droms | Telechat date has been changed to 2011-02-17 from 2011-02-03 |
2011-02-03
|
09 | Ralph Droms | Responsible AD has been changed to Ralph Droms from Russ Housley |
2011-02-03
|
09 | Ralph Droms | Status Date has been changed to 2011-02-03 from None |
2011-01-27
|
09 | Cindy Morgan | From: Aaron Falk This is a request for the IESG to perform a RFC5742 review of draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv [1] to be published an an Informational IRTF … From: Aaron Falk This is a request for the IESG to perform a RFC5742 review of draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv [1] to be published an an Informational IRTF RFC. The document has been approved for publication by the IRSG. See [2] for details on prior reviews. Please copy all correspondence to the document shepherd, Elwyn Davies . --aaron IRTF Chair [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv [2] http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/ticket/30 |
2011-01-27
|
09 | Cindy Morgan | Draft added in state Publication Requested |
2011-01-27
|
09 | Cindy Morgan | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-02-03 |
2011-01-27
|
09 | Cindy Morgan | [Note]: 'IRTF Submission. Elwyn Davies (elwynd@dial.pipex.com) is the document shepherd.' added |
2011-01-26
|
08 | (System) | New version available: draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv-08.txt |
2010-10-11
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv-07.txt |
2010-07-26
|
09 | (System) | Document has expired |
2010-01-13
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv-06.txt |
2009-12-22
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv-05.txt |
2009-11-19
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv-04.txt |
2009-08-18
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv-03.txt |
2009-08-18
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv-02.txt |
2009-01-09
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv-01.txt |
2007-09-18
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv-00.txt |