Skip to main content

Host Identity Protocol Distributed Hash Table Interface
draft-irtf-hiprg-dht-05

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
05 (System) Notify list changed from jeffrey.m.ahrenholz@boeing.com, draft-irtf-hiprg-dht@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2012-02-29
05 (System) RFC published
2012-02-10
05 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2012-01-24
05 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2012-01-24
05 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2012-01-24
05 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-01-24
05 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text changed
2012-01-24
05 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text regenerated
2012-01-24
05 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup text changed
2012-01-11
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2012-01-11
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2012-01-10
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-01-09
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-12-14
05 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hiprg-dht-05.txt
2011-11-24
05 Samuel Weiler Assignment of request for Last Call review by SECDIR to Phillip Hallam-Baker was rejected
2011-11-17
05 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-11-03
05 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-11-03
05 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-11-03
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Discuss cleared after explanation
2011-11-03
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot discuss]
D
2011-11-03
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-11-03
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2011-11-03
05 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
This information was provided to the ISE:

  The Gen-ART Review by Kathleen Moriarty on 20-Oct-2011 raised a
  concern about the use …
[Ballot comment]
This information was provided to the ISE:

  The Gen-ART Review by Kathleen Moriarty on 20-Oct-2011 raised a
  concern about the use of SHA-1.  The authors said a change would be
  made, but it has not been posted yet.
2011-11-03
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-11-03
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-03
05 Gonzalo Camarillo
[Ballot comment]
I am clearing my discuss because Ralph had already run an IETF LC on this. Anyway, since some people in the HIP WG …
[Ballot comment]
I am clearing my discuss because Ralph had already run an IETF LC on this. Anyway, since some people in the HIP WG seem to have missed it, I have sent a note to the HIP WG's list so that everybody is aware of this draft. Additionally, I have also ask the WG to consider this issue when working on the bis specs.
2011-11-03
05 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] Position for Gonzalo Camarillo has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-11-03
05 Gonzalo Camarillo
[Ballot discuss]
This discuss relates to the discusses Jari and Adrian have on the document. In HIP, the idea is that new packet types are …
[Ballot discuss]
This discuss relates to the discusses Jari and Adrian have on the document. In HIP, the idea is that new packet types are defined in the HIP WG (the policy requires that they are defined within the IETF). This draft was not discussed in the WG. Practically speaking, there is of course a substantial overlap between people following the WG and people following the RG. However, this was not discussed formally in the WG.

As a way forward, we need to decide whether we want to advance this work as an AD sponsor draft or as a HIP WG item. In practice, what we need is the HIP WG to have a look at it and give its OK and an IETF LC.

With respect to whether or not we still want this IANA policy in the HIP bis specs, I will bring this up in the HIP WG. The authors of this draft do not need to worry about that at all.
2011-11-03
05 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-03
05 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Ari Keränen helped me look at this draft and he pointed out the following:

The packet defines a new HIP packet type [1] …
[Ballot discuss]
Ari Keränen helped me look at this draft and he pointed out the following:

The packet defines a new HIP packet type [1] but these values can only be allocated through "IETF
Consensus" which implies that the draft couldn't really come from outside the IETF [3]

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-hiprg-dht-04#section-8
[2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5201#section-9
[3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5226#section-4.1

IESG Approval for this registry would have been the right thing. Food for thought for RFC 5201bis?
2011-11-03
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-02
05 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-02
05 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-02
05 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-02
05 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-02
05 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-01
05 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
A quick process question before I move to a No Objection ballot.

Was this document explicitly brought to the attention of the HIP …
[Ballot discuss]
A quick process question before I move to a No Objection ballot.

Was this document explicitly brought to the attention of the HIP working group (as well as the IETF last call)?
2011-11-01
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-01
05 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART Review by Kathleen Moriarty on 20-Oct-2011 raised a
  concern about the use of SHA-1.  The authors said a change would …
[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART Review by Kathleen Moriarty on 20-Oct-2011 raised a
  concern about the use of SHA-1.  The authors said a change would be
  made, but it has not been posted yet.
2011-11-01
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-01
05 Ralph Droms State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-11-01
05 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-10-31
05 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-10-26
05 Amanda Baber
In the HIP Packet Type registry in the Host Identity Protocol (HIP)
Parameters registry located at:

http://www.iana.org/assignments/hip-parameters/hip-parameters.xml

a new packet type is to be registered …
In the HIP Packet Type registry in the Host Identity Protocol (HIP)
Parameters registry located at:

http://www.iana.org/assignments/hip-parameters/hip-parameters.xml

a new packet type is to be registered as follows:

Value: [ tbd ]
Packet Type: HIP Distributed Hash Table
Reference: [ RFC-to-be ]

IANA notes that the authors have suggested a value of 20.

IANA understands that this is the only action required to be completed
upon approval of this document.
2011-10-18
05 Ralph Droms Ballot writeup text changed
2011-10-18
05 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
Expand acronyms on first use and/or give pointer to terminology and/or
add terrninology section.
2011-10-18
05 Ralph Droms Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-11-03
2011-10-18
05 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2011-10-18
05 Ralph Droms Ballot has been issued
2011-10-18
05 Ralph Droms Created "Approve" ballot
2011-10-18
05 Ralph Droms Ballot writeup text changed
2011-10-10
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Phillip Hallam-Baker
2011-10-10
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Phillip Hallam-Baker
2011-10-04
05 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-10-04
05 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org …
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call:  (Host Identity Protocol Distributed Hash Table Interface) to Experimental RFC


The IESG has received a request to review the following document,
submitted for publication as an Experimental RFC by the IRTF:

  'Host Identity Protocol Distributed Hash Table Interface'
 

This document calls for the assignment of a new HIP Packet Type from
the HIP Packet Type registry,
http://www.iana.org/assignments/hip-parameters/hip-parameters.xml
Assignment of HIP Packet Types requires IETF consensus.  The purpose
of this last call is to assess IETF consensus for the assignment
described in the document.

Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by
2011-11-01. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org
instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject
line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract

  This document specifies a common interface for using HIP with a
  Distributed Hash Table service to provide a name-to-Host-Identity-Tag
  lookup service and a Host-Identity-Tag-to-address lookup service.

The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-hiprg-dht/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-hiprg-dht/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.


2011-10-04
05 Ralph Droms Last Call was requested
2011-10-04
05 Ralph Droms State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation.
2011-10-04
05 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-10-04
05 (System) Last call text was added
2011-10-04
05 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-10-04
05 Ralph Droms State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-10-04
05 Ralph Droms Last Call text changed
2011-09-22
05 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-09-22
05 Amy Vezza Responsible AD has been changed to Ralph Droms from Russ Housley
2011-09-21
05 Amy Vezza Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-09-21
05 Amy Vezza Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-09-22
2011-09-21
05 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'The document shepherd is Tom Henderson (thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com).' added
2011-07-08
04 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hiprg-dht-04.txt
2011-02-28
03 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hiprg-dht-03.txt
2010-10-06
02 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hiprg-dht-02.txt
2010-07-26
01 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hiprg-dht-01.txt
2010-06-28
00 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hiprg-dht-00.txt