Design Considerations for Name Resolution Service in Information-Centric Networking (ICN)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this draft ready for publication in the IRTF stream?"
Dirk Kutscher Yes
Marie-Jose Montpetit Yes
Colin Perkins No Objection
Mirja Kühlewind No Objection
Comment (2021-07-16 for -05)
This document is ready for publication. The only question I has is why this document draft-irtf-icnrg-nrsarch-considerations are two different documents? In section 4, you can probably remove the following sentence given no upper letter MUSTs or SHOULDs are used: "The key words "MUST", "MAY", and "SHOULD" in this section are used consistently with [RFC2119]." Also in the sentence before you say: "This section presents the design considerations for NRS in ICN, not requirements." Not sure what that actually means... what's the important difference for you?
Stephen Farrell No Objection
Comment (2021-07-13 for -05)
I have a nit and a question that doesn't need to be answered:-) Nit: The intro says "uniquely identified by IP address" but anycast exists and doesn't match that (and multicast wouldn't really either.) Question: I don't understand how an NRS can do access control in any realistic context. (The reason that doesn't need to be answered is that I don't think there really is an answer that works.) That definitely ought not block the document though.
David Oran Recuse
Comment (2021-05-02 for -05)
I'm the document shepherd