%% You should probably cite rfc9265 instead of this I-D. @techreport{irtf-nwcrg-coding-and-congestion-01, number = {draft-irtf-nwcrg-coding-and-congestion-01}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-nwcrg-coding-and-congestion/01/}, author = {Nicolas Kuhn and Emmanuel Lochin and François Michel and Michael Welzl}, title = {{Coding and congestion control in transport}}, pagetotal = 9, year = , month = , day = , abstract = {Coding is a reliability mechanism that is distinct and separated from the loss detection of congestion controls. Using coding can be a useful way to better deal with tail losses or with networks with non- congestion losses. However, coding mechanisms should not hide congestion signals. This memo offers a discussion of how coding and congestion control can coexist. This document can help the comparison of FEC schemes by identifying at which level they are operating with respect to the transport congestion control. This document is the product of the Coding for Efficient Network Communications Research Group (NWCRG). The scope of the document is end-to-end communications: coding for tunnels is out-of-the scope of the document.}, }