On the Generation of Transient Numeric Identifiers
draft-irtf-pearg-numeric-ids-generation-03

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (pearg RG)
Authors Fernando Gont  , Ivan Arce 
Last updated 2020-09-08
Replaces draft-gont-predictable-protocol-ids, draft-gont-numeric-ids-generation
Stream IRTF
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats plain text pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Reviews
Stream IRTF state Active RG Document
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Document shepherd Shivan Sahib
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to Shivan Sahib <shivankaulsahib@gmail.com>
Internet Research Task Force (IRTF)                              F. Gont
Internet-Draft                                              SI6 Networks
Intended status: Informational                                   I. Arce
Expires: March 12, 2021                                        Quarkslab
                                                       September 8, 2020

           On the Generation of Transient Numeric Identifiers
               draft-irtf-pearg-numeric-ids-generation-03

Abstract

   This document performs an analysis of the security and privacy
   implications of different types of "numeric identifiers" used in IETF
   protocols, and tries to categorize them based on their
   interoperability requirements and the associated failure severity
   when such requirements are not met.  Subsequently, it provides advice
   on possible algorithms that could be employed to satisfy the
   interoperability requirements of each identifier category, while
   minimizing the security and privacy implications, thus providing
   guidance to protocol designers and protocol implementers.  Finally,
   this describes a number of algorithms that have been employed in real
   implementations to generate transient numeric identifiers and
   analyzes their security and privacy properties.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on March 12, 2021.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

Gont & Arce              Expires March 12, 2021                 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft     Generation of Transient Numeric IDs    September 2020

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   3.  Threat Model  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   4.  Issues with the Specification of Identifiers  . . . . . . . .   5
   5.  Protocol Failure Severity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   6.  Categorizing Identifiers  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   7.  Common Algorithms for Transient Numeric Identifier Generation   9
     7.1.  Category #1: Uniqueness (soft failure)  . . . . . . . . .   9
     7.2.  Category #2: Uniqueness (hard failure)  . . . . . . . . .  12
     7.3.  Category #3: Uniqueness, stable within context (soft
           failure)  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
     7.4.  Category #4: Uniqueness, monotonically increasing within
           context (hard failure)  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   8.  Common Vulnerabilities Associated with Transient Numeric
       Identifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
     8.1.  Network Activity Correlation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
     8.2.  Information Leakage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
     8.3.  Exploitation of Semantics of Transient Numeric
           Identifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  21
     8.4.  Exploitation of Collisions of Transient Numeric
           Identifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  21
     8.5.  Cryptanalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  21
   9.  Vulnerability Analysis of Specific Transient Numeric
       Identifiers Categories  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  22
     9.1.  Category #1: Uniqueness (soft failure)  . . . . . . . . .  22
     9.2.  Category #2: Uniqueness (hard failure)  . . . . . . . . .  23
     9.3.  Category #3: Uniqueness, stable within context (soft
           failure)  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  23
     9.4.  Category #4: Uniqueness, monotonically increasing within
           context (hard failure)  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  23
   10. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  25
   11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  26
   12. Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  26
   13. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  26
Show full document text