Skip to main content

IPv4 Options for the Identifier-Locator Network Protocol (ILNP)
draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-v4opts-06

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: "Lars Eggert" <lars@netapp.com>, "Internet Research Steering Group" <irsg@irtf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, <iana@iana.org>, <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, tony.li@tony.li
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for <draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-v4opts-05.txt>

The IESG has completed a review of <draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-v4opts>
consistent with RFC5742.  This review is applied to all non-IETF streams.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'IPv4 Options for ILNPv4'
<draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-v4opts-05.txt> as an Experimental RFC.

The IESG would also like the IRSG to review the comments in
the datatracker
(http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-v4opts/) related to
this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into
the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-v4opts/

The process for such documents is described at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary


Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   This document defines 2 new IPv4 options that are used only with
   ILNP for IPv4 (ILNPv4).  ILNP is is an experimental, evolutionary
   enhancement to IP. This document is a product of the IRTF Routing
   RG.

Working Group Summary

   This document is a product of the IRTF Routing RG.

Document Quality

   Ralph Droms reviewed the document according to RFC 5742 and
   recommends responding that the IESG has no problem with the
   publication of 'IPv4 Options for ILNPv4'
   <draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-v4opts> as an Experimental RFC, along
   with the RFC Editor Note below.


Personnel

   Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> is the document shepherd.  Ralph
   Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> managed the IESG review.

RFC Editor Note

      The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done
      in WGs HIP and LISP, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.


RFC Editor Note