A URN Namespace for ucode
draft-ishikawa-yrpunl-ucode-urn-03
Yes
(Peter Saint-Andre)
No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-02-14)
Unknown
I agree with the concern about the term "Internet of Things". I don't think the use of that term is needed to justify this work, and I believe the I-D would be easier to read and more compelling if the term was left out. It is good enough to say "ucode exists and is use din many applications. This document provides a URN namespace for ucode to enable its use in Internet-related devices and software."
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-02-13)
Unknown
Instead of creating a new hex-decimal, please use HEXDIG from RFC 5234.
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-02-14)
Unknown
- Can someone tell me if uidcenter.org is ok as an SDO for a normative reference or not? I've never heard of 'em but this may be outside my normal sphere of operation. - Even if uidcenter.org is ok, their normaive July 28 2009 document (with a 2010 copyright?) or white paper or working draft doesn't seem like a very stable document as a normative reference for an RFC. - Even if it were, then it appears that this I-D a) repeats the text from the [UCODE] ref - if uidcenter.org are a bona-fide SDO why is an RFC needed that says the same thing?) and b) has no new substantive technical content, so I'm puzzled by that. - If "Applications that use ucode take advantage of the Internet extensively" is true, then what applications are those and why are there no references to them? - What is a "small user"?
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-02-14)
Unknown
I agree with Stephen's DISCUSS that the language on IoT could be tightened up. IoT is more of a concept than something concrete, and there are different approaches to IoT, not all of which necessarily involve ucode.