Skip to main content

Dynamic Registration and Configuration Protocol (DRCP)
draft-itsumo-drcp-01

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Expired & archived
Authors Anthony McAuley , Sunil H. Madhani , Dr. Yasuro Shobatake
Last updated 2000-07-24
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) provides a framework for passing configuration information to hosts [DHC]. DHCP was, however, designed for hosts on a fixed LAN, not for nodes roaming among commercial wireless networks. A Mobile IP [MIP] Foreign Agent gives some powerful plug and play capability for roaming hosts, especially when combined with some recent proposals [e.g., MIPA, MIPC, MIPD, MIPN, HAW, CEL, TIA]. Mobile IP functionality, however is not always needed and for some dynamic networks it may be undesirable to use Foreign Agents. This draft proposes a lightweight dynamic configuration protocol, called the Dynamic Registration and Configuration Protocol (DRCP). DRCP borrows heavily from DHCP and can switch to using DHCP protocol if only DHCP servers are present in the network; but adds features critical to roaming users. Most importantly, DRCP allows rapid configuration by moving address consistency checking from the critical path. Other new features allow: a) clients to know when to get a new address independent of the layer-2 access technology, b) efficient use of scarce wireless bandwidth, c) clients to be routers, d) dynamic addition or deletion of address pools to any DRCP node, and e) message exchange without broadcast.

Authors

Anthony McAuley
Sunil H. Madhani
Dr. Yasuro Shobatake

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)