%% You should probably cite draft-iurman-6man-carry-identifier instead of this I-D.
@techreport{iurman-6man-generic-id-00,
    number =    {draft-iurman-6man-generic-id-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iurman-6man-generic-id/00/},
    author =    {Justin Iurman},
    title =     {{Carrying a Generic Identifier in IPv6 packets}},
    pagetotal = 7,
    year =      2022,
    month =     aug,
    day =       6,
    abstract =  {Some recent use cases seem to have a need for carrying IDs within packets. Two examples are \_I-D.draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id\_ and \_I-D.draft-li-6man-topology-id\_. While they might perfectly make sense on their own, each document requires IANA to allocate a new code point for a new option, which could quickly exhaust the allocation space if similar designs are proposed in the future. As an example, one might need an 8-bit ID, while another one might need a 24-bit, 32-bit, or 64-bit ID. Or, even worse, one might need a 32-bit ID in a specific context, while someone else might also need a 32-bit ID in another context. Therefore, allocating a new code point for each similar option is probably not the way to go.},
}