Skip to main content

A YANG Data Model for In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Integrity Protected Options
draft-iuzh-ippm-ioam-integrity-yang-00

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Authors Justin Iurman , Tianran Zhou
Last updated 2024-08-31
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Yang Validation 0 errors, 0 warnings
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-iuzh-ippm-ioam-integrity-yang-00
ippm                                                           J. Iurman
Internet-Draft                                       University of Liege
Intended status: Standards Track                                 T. Zhou
Expires: 4 March 2025                                             Huawei
                                                          31 August 2024

     A YANG Data Model for In Situ Operations, Administration, and
             Maintenance (IOAM) Integrity Protected Options
                 draft-iuzh-ippm-ioam-integrity-yang-00

Abstract

   In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) is an
   example of an on-path hybrid measurement method.  IOAM defines a
   method for producing operational and telemetry information that may
   be exported using the in-band or out-of-band method.  I-D.ietf-ippm-
   ioam-data-integrity defines IOAM Options with integrity protection,
   also called Integrity Protected Options.  This document defines a
   YANG module for the configuration of these Integirty Protected
   Options.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 4 March 2025.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights

Iurman & Zhou             Expires 4 March 2025                  [Page 1]
Internet-Draft    YANG Model for IOAM Integrity Options      August 2024

   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.1.  Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.2.  Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.3.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.4.  Tree Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Design of the IOAM Integrity YANG Data Model  . . . . . . . .   4
     3.1.  Overview  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.2.  Integrity Protected Pre-allocated Tracing Profile . . . .   4
     3.3.  Integrity Protected Incremental Tracing Profile . . . . .   5
     3.4.  Integrity Protected Proof of Transit Profile  . . . . . .   5
     3.5.  Integrity Protected Edge-to-Edge Profile  . . . . . . . .   5
   4.  IOAM Integrity YANG Module  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   7.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   8.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   Appendix A.  An Example of the Integrity Protected Pre-allocated
           Tracing Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   Appendix B.  An Example of the Integrity Protected Incremental
           Tracing Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   Appendix C.  An Example of the Integrity Protected Proof of Transit
           Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   Appendix D.  An Example of the Integrity Protected Edge-to-Edge
           Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13

1.  Introduction

   In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) is an
   example of an on-path hybrid measurement method.  IOAM defines a
   method for producing operational and telemetry information that may
   be exported using the in-band or out-of-band method.
   [I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity] defines IOAM Options with
   integrity protection, also called Integrity Protected Options.  This
   document defines a data model for the configuration of these
   Integirty Protected Options using the YANG data modeling language
   [RFC7950].  This YANG data model supports four IOAM Integrity
   Protected Options, which are as follows:

Iurman & Zhou             Expires 4 March 2025                  [Page 2]
Internet-Draft    YANG Model for IOAM Integrity Options      August 2024

   *  Integrity Protected Incremental Trace-Option
      [I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity]
   *  Integrity Protected Pre-allocated Trace-Option
      [I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity]
   *  Integrity Protected Proof of Transit (POT) Option
      [I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity]
   *  Integrity Protected Edge-to-Edge (E2E) Option
      [I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity]

2.  Conventions

2.1.  Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

2.2.  Abbreviations

   Abbreviations used in this document:

   OAM:  Operations, Administration, and Maintenance
   IOAM:  In Situ OAM
   POT:  Proof of Transit
   E2E:  Edge to Edge

2.3.  Terminology

   The following terms are defined in [RFC7950] and are used in this
   specification:

   *  augment
   *  data model
   *  data node

   The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in
   [RFC7950].

2.4.  Tree Diagrams

   Tree diagrams used in this document follow the notation defined in
   [RFC8340].

Iurman & Zhou             Expires 4 March 2025                  [Page 3]
Internet-Draft    YANG Model for IOAM Integrity Options      August 2024

3.  Design of the IOAM Integrity YANG Data Model

3.1.  Overview

   The IOAM Integrity model is organized as a list of profiles, as shown
   in the following figure.

   module: ietf-ioam-integrity

     augment /ioam:ioam/ioam:profiles/ioam:profile:
       +--rw int-incremental-tracing-profile! {int-incremental-trace}?
       |  ...
       +--rw int-preallocated-tracing-profile! {int-preallocated-trace}?
       |  ...
       +--rw int-pot-profile! {int-proof-of-transit}?
       |  ...
       +--rw int-e2e-profile! {int-edge-to-edge}?

   This document uses the "ietf-ioam" YANG module [RFC9617] and augments
   its definition of a profile.  The supported profiles are indicated by
   four defined features, i.e., "int-incremental-trace", "int-
   preallocated-trace", "int-proof-of-transit", and "int-edge-to-edge".

   The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network
   Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in [RFC8342].

3.2.  Integrity Protected Pre-allocated Tracing Profile

   The "int-preallocated-tracing-profile" parameter contains the
   detailed information for the pre-allocated tracing data with
   integrity protection.  This information is the same as for the Pre-
   allocated Tracing Profile; see [RFC9617], Sec. 3.2.  This information
   also includes:

   int-method:  indicates which Integrity Protection Method is used.

   +--rw int-preallocated-tracing-profile! {int-preallocated-trace}?
      +--rw node-action?   ioam-node-action
      +--rw trace-types
      |  +--rw use-namespace?   ioam-namespace
      |  +--rw trace-type*      ioam-trace-type
      +--rw max-length?    uint32
      +--rw int-method?    method-type

Iurman & Zhou             Expires 4 March 2025                  [Page 4]
Internet-Draft    YANG Model for IOAM Integrity Options      August 2024

3.3.  Integrity Protected Incremental Tracing Profile

   The "int-incremental-tracing-profile" parameter contains the detailed
   information for the incremental tracing data with integrity
   protection.  This information is the same as for the Integrity
   Protected Pre-allocated Tracing Profile; see Section 3.2.

   +--rw int-incremental-tracing-profile! {int-incremental-trace}?
      +--rw node-action?   ioam-node-action
      +--rw trace-types
      |  +--rw use-namespace?   ioam-namespace
      |  +--rw trace-type*      ioam-trace-type
      +--rw max-length?    uint32
      +--rw int-method?    method-type

3.4.  Integrity Protected Proof of Transit Profile

   The "int-pot-profile" parameter is intended to contain the detailed
   information for the proof of transit data with integrity protection.
   This information is the same as for the Proof of Transit Profile; see
   [RFC9617], Sec. 3.5.  This information also includes:

   node-action:  the same semantic as provided in Section 3.2.
   int-method:  the same semantic as provided in Section 3.2.

   +--rw int-pot-profile! {int-proof-of-transit}?
      +--rw use-namespace?   ioam:ioam-namespace
      +--rw pot-type?        ioam:ioam-pot-type
      +--rw node-action?     ioam:ioam-node-action
      +--rw int-method?      method-type

3.5.  Integrity Protected Edge-to-Edge Profile

   The "int-e2e-profile" parameter contains the detailed information for
   the edge-to-edge data with integrity protection.  This information is
   the same as for the Edge-to-Edge Profile; see [RFC9617], Sec. 3.6.
   This information also includes:

   int-method:  the same semantic as provided in Section 3.2.

   +--rw int-e2e-profile! {int-edge-to-edge}?
      +--rw node-action?   ioam-node-action
      +--rw e2e-types
      |  +--rw use-namespace?   ioam-namespace
      |  +--rw e2e-type*        ioam-e2e-type
      +--rw int-method?    method-type

Iurman & Zhou             Expires 4 March 2025                  [Page 5]
Internet-Draft    YANG Model for IOAM Integrity Options      August 2024

4.  IOAM Integrity YANG Module

   The "ietf-ioam-integrity" module defined in this document imports the
   "ietf-ioam" module defined in [RFC9617].  This document also
   references [I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity].

   <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-ioam-integrity@2024-08-31.yang"
   module ietf-ioam-integrity {
     yang-version 1.1;
     namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ioam-integrity";
     prefix "ioam-int";

     import ietf-ioam {
       prefix ioam;
       reference
         "RFC 9617: A YANG Data Model for In Situ Operations,
          Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM)";
     }

     organization
       "IETF IPPM (IP Performance Measurement) Working Group";

     contact
       "WG Web:   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ippm>
        WG List:  <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
        Author:   Tianran Zhou
                  <mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com>
        Author:   Justin Iurman
                  <mailto:justin.iurman@uliege.be>";

     description
       "This YANG module specifies a vendor-independent data model for
        In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM)
        Integrity Protected Options.

        The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
        NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED',
        'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as
        described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when,
        they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

        Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
        authors of the code.  All rights reserved.

        Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
        without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
        the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set
        forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions

Iurman & Zhou             Expires 4 March 2025                  [Page 6]
Internet-Draft    YANG Model for IOAM Integrity Options      August 2024

        Relating to IETF Documents
        (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).

        This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the
        RFC itself for full legal notices.";

     revision 2024-08-31 {
       description
         "Initial revision.";
       reference
         "RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for In Situ Operations,
          Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Integrity Protected
          Options";
     }

     /*
      * FEATURES
      */

     feature int-incremental-trace
     {
       description
         "This feature indicates that the Integrity Protected
          Incremental Trace-Option is supported.";
       reference
         "RFC YYYY: Integrity Protection of In Situ Operations,
          Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Data Fields";
     }

     feature int-preallocated-trace
     {
       description
         "This feature indicates that the Integrity Protected
          Pre-allocated Trace-Option is supported.";
       reference
         "RFC YYYY: Integrity Protection of In Situ Operations,
          Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Data Fields";
     }

     feature int-proof-of-transit
     {
       description
         "This feature indicates that the Integrity Protected Proof of
          Transit Option is supported.";
       reference
         "RFC YYYY: Integrity Protection of In Situ Operations,
          Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Data Fields";
     }

Iurman & Zhou             Expires 4 March 2025                  [Page 7]
Internet-Draft    YANG Model for IOAM Integrity Options      August 2024

     feature int-edge-to-edge
     {
       description
         "This feature indicates that the Integrity Protected
          Edge-to-Edge Option is supported.";
       reference
         "RFC YYYY: Integrity Protection of In Situ Operations,
          Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Data Fields";
     }

     /*
      * IDENTITIES
      */

     identity method {
       description
         "Base identity to represent the Integrity Protection Method.";
     }

     identity method-1 {
       base method;
       description
         "The Integrity Protection Method 1 uses AES-GMAC with a 12-byte
          Nonce and a 16-byte ICV.";
       reference
         "RFC YYYY: Integrity Protection of In Situ Operations,
          Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Data Fields";
     }

     /*
      * TYPE DEFINITIONS
      */

     typedef method-type {
       type identityref {
         base method;
       }
       description
         "It specifies the Integrity Protection Method.";
     }

     /*
      * DATA NODES
      */

     augment "/ioam:ioam/ioam:profiles/ioam:profile" {
       description
         "This augmentation adds 4 profiles for the Integrity Protected

Iurman & Zhou             Expires 4 March 2025                  [Page 8]
Internet-Draft    YANG Model for IOAM Integrity Options      August 2024

          Options.";

       container int-incremental-tracing-profile {
         if-feature "int-incremental-trace";
         presence
           "Enables the Integrity Protected Incremental Trace-Option.";
         description
           "This container describes the profile for the Integrity
            Protected Incremental Trace-Option.";

         uses ioam:ioam-incremental-tracing-profile;

         leaf int-method {
           when "derived-from-or-self(../node-action,
              'ioam:action-encapsulate')";
           type method-type;
           default "method-1";
           description
             "This object indicates the Integrity Protection Method for
              this profile.";
         }
       }

       container int-preallocated-tracing-profile {
         if-feature "int-preallocated-trace";
         presence
           "Enables the Integrity Protected Pre-allocated
            Trace-Option.";
         description
           "This container describes the profile for the Integrity
            Protected Pre-allocated Trace-Option.";

         uses ioam:ioam-preallocated-tracing-profile;

         leaf int-method {
           when "derived-from-or-self(../node-action,
              'ioam:action-encapsulate')";
           type method-type;
           default "method-1";
           description
             "This object indicates the Integrity Protection Method for
              this profile.";
         }
       }

       container int-pot-profile {
         if-feature "int-proof-of-transit";
         presence

Iurman & Zhou             Expires 4 March 2025                  [Page 9]
Internet-Draft    YANG Model for IOAM Integrity Options      August 2024

           "Enables the Integrity Protected Proof of Transit Option.";
         description
           "This container describes the profile for the Integrity
            Protected Proof of Transit Option.";

         leaf use-namespace {
           type ioam:ioam-namespace;
           default "ioam:default-namespace";
           description
             "This object indicates the namespace used for the
              POT types.";
         }

         leaf pot-type {
           type ioam:ioam-pot-type;
           description
             "The type of a particular POT variant that specifies
              the POT data that is included.";
         }

         leaf node-action {
           type ioam:ioam-node-action;
           default "ioam:action-transit";
           description
             "This object indicates the action the node needs to
              take, e.g., encapsulation.";
         }

         leaf int-method {
           when "derived-from-or-self(../node-action,
              'ioam:action-encapsulate')";
           type method-type;
           default "method-1";
           description
             "This object indicates the Integrity Protection Method for
              this profile.";
         }
       }

       container int-e2e-profile {
         if-feature "int-edge-to-edge";
         presence
           "Enables the Integrity Protected Edge-to-Edge Option.";
         description
           "This container describes the profile for the Integrity
            Protected Edge-to-Edge Option.";

         uses ioam:ioam-e2e-profile;

Iurman & Zhou             Expires 4 March 2025                 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft    YANG Model for IOAM Integrity Options      August 2024

         leaf int-method {
           when "derived-from-or-self(../node-action,
              'ioam:action-encapsulate')";
           type method-type;
           default "method-1";
           description
             "This object indicates the Integrity Protection Method for
              this profile.";
         }
       }
     }
   }
   <CODE ENDS>

5.  Security Considerations

   Security considerations listed in [RFC9617] also apply here.  This
   document does not introduce new security considerations.

6.  IANA Considerations

   RFC Ed.: In this section and in Section 4, please replace all
   occurrences of 'XXXX' with the actual RFC number.  Also in Section 4,
   please replace all occurrences of 'YYYY' with the actual RFC number
   of [I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity] (and remove this note).

   IANA is requested to assign a new URI from the "IETF XML Registry"
   [RFC3688].  The following URI is suggested:

   URI:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ioam-integrity
   Registrant Contact:  The IESG.
   XML:  N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.

   This document also requests a new YANG module name in the "YANG
   Module Names" registry [RFC6020] with the following suggestion:

   Name:  ietf-ioam-integrity
   Namespace:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ioam-integrity
   Prefix:  ioam-int
   Reference:  RFC XXXX

7.  Acknowledgements

   TBD

8.  Normative References

Iurman & Zhou             Expires 4 March 2025                 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft    YANG Model for IOAM Integrity Options      August 2024

   [I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity]
              Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., Mizrahi, T., and J. Iurman,
              "Integrity Protection of In Situ Operations,
              Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Data Fields", Work
              in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-
              integrity-12, 28 August 2024,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-
              ioam-data-integrity-12>.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC3688]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.

   [RFC6020]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
              the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.

   [RFC7950]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
              RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

   [RFC8340]  Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
              BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.

   [RFC8342]  Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
              and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
              (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>.

   [RFC9617]  Zhou, T., Ed., Guichard, J., Brockners, F., and S.
              Raghavan, "A YANG Data Model for In Situ Operations,
              Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM)", RFC 9617,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC9617, August 2024,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9617>.

Iurman & Zhou             Expires 4 March 2025                 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft    YANG Model for IOAM Integrity Options      August 2024

Appendix A.  An Example of the Integrity Protected Pre-allocated Tracing
             Profile

   TBD

Appendix B.  An Example of the Integrity Protected Incremental Tracing
             Profile

   TBD

Appendix C.  An Example of the Integrity Protected Proof of Transit
             Profile

   TBD

Appendix D.  An Example of the Integrity Protected Edge-to-Edge Profile

   TBD

Authors' Addresses

   Justin Iurman
   University of Liege
   10, Allee de la decouverte (B28)
   4000 Sart-Tilman
   Belgium
   Email: justin.iurman@uliege.be

   Tianran Zhou
   Huawei
   156 Beiqing Rd.
   Beijing
   100095
   China
   Email: zhoutianran@huawei.com

Iurman & Zhou             Expires 4 March 2025                 [Page 13]