Skip to main content

A Group Text Chat Purpose for Conference and Service URIs in the SIP Event Package for Conference State
draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose-04

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2014-01-03
04 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2014-01-03
04 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2013-12-08
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2013-12-06
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2013-12-06
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2013-12-03
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2013-12-03
04 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2013-12-03
04 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2013-12-03
04 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2013-12-03
04 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2013-12-03
04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2013-12-03
04 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-12-03
04 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2013-12-03
04 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-11-29
04 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
Thanks for dealing with my discuss points.
2013-11-29
04 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-11-04
04 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2013-11-04
04 Emil Ivov IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed
2013-11-04
04 Emil Ivov New version available: draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose-04.txt
2013-09-26
03 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation
2013-09-26
03 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2013-09-26
03 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2013-09-25
03 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-09-25
03 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I would need someone more clueful than I to pronounce on this, but don't we have better things to include in an example …
[Ballot comment]
I would need someone more clueful than I to pronounce on this, but don't we have better things to include in an example than:
http://sharepoint/salesgroup/
2013-09-25
03 Adrian Farrel Ballot comment text updated for Adrian Farrel
2013-09-25
03 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-09-25
03 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Did the *content* of this document get any review at all in the IETF? I know that DISPATCH looked at it, but that's …
[Ballot comment]
Did the *content* of this document get any review at all in the IETF? I know that DISPATCH looked at it, but that's a "where should this be handled" review rather than a content review. I see no discussion of it on the IETF list. Is this actually an IETF consensus document? (The general subject is a current topic of conversation between the IAB and IESG, so shedding some light on this case might prove useful. It should not stop publication of this document.)
2013-09-25
03 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2013-09-25
03 Spencer Dawkins
[Ballot comment]
I did have one question, which you might consider along with any other comments you receive during the evaluation process.

I'm reading (quickly) …
[Ballot comment]
I did have one question, which you might consider along with any other comments you receive during the evaluation process.

I'm reading (quickly) this specification plus RFC 4575 taken together as saying that a conference description with two grouptextchat purposes would be valid, so that a conference can advertise both an XMPP URI and an SIP URI with grouptextchat purpose, for instance.

If that's valid, is there any expectation that if I type something into one of these group chats, it would show up for people in another chat advertised in the same conference description?

You could also tell me that everyone uses XMPP for group chats, so this isn't an interesting question, of course :-)
2013-09-25
03 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2013-09-25
03 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-09-25
03 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
s2: On the display the chatroom mitigation if there's no network security:

a) exactly what gets displayed: host or host:port is?  I guess …
[Ballot discuss]
s2: On the display the chatroom mitigation if there's no network security:

a) exactly what gets displayed: host or host:port is?  I guess I'm asking from where is the data to be displayed pulled?

b) Is there anything the client should be checking for the user because leaving it up to the user is likely not a good idea - i.e., can the client do some normal matching to see if the fields in the request to join the conference match the ones in the response that said yeah you can join?
2013-09-25
03 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
s2: I think here you meant to say 4575 recommends this things and so do we:

OLD:

  Similar attacks are already possible …
[Ballot comment]
s2: I think here you meant to say 4575 recommends this things and so do we:

OLD:

  Similar attacks are already possible with the "participation"
  defined in [RFC4575] which is why it recommends "a
  strong means for authentication and conference information
  protection" as well as "comprehensive authorization rules".

NEW:

  Similar attacks are already possible with the "participation"
  defined in [RFC4575] which is why it and this
  document recommend "a
  strong means for authentication and conference information
  protection" as well as "comprehensive authorization rules".
2013-09-25
03 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-09-24
03 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-09-24
03 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-09-20
03 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
I notice the following fragment in a couple of places:

Agenda: This sprint's goals

Given that Sprint is a service provider in this …
[Ballot comment]
I notice the following fragment in a couple of places:

Agenda: This sprint's goals

Given that Sprint is a service provider in this sector, it would be better to pick a neutral name.
2013-09-20
03 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-09-12
03 Gonzalo Camarillo Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-09-26
2013-09-12
03 Gonzalo Camarillo State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2013-09-12
03 Gonzalo Camarillo Ballot has been issued
2013-09-12
03 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2013-09-12
03 Gonzalo Camarillo Created "Approve" ballot
2013-09-12
03 Gonzalo Camarillo Ballot writeup was changed
2013-07-25
03 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Leif Johansson.
2013-07-22
03 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2013-07-19
03 Meral Shirazipour Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour.
2013-07-19
03 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2013-07-19
03 Pearl Liang
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose-03.  Authors should review the comments and/or questions below.  Please report any inaccuracies and respond to any questions as soon …
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose-03.  Authors should review the comments and/or questions below.  Please report any inaccuracies and respond to any questions as soon as possible.

We received the following comments/questions from the IANA's reviewer:

We understand that, upon approval of this document, there is a single IANA action which needs to be completed.

In the URI Purposes subregistry of the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Parameters located at:

http://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters/sip-parameters.xhtml

a single new URI Purpose will be registered as follows:

Value: grouptextchat
Description: The URI can be used to join a multi-user chat directly associated with the conference
Reference: [ RFC-to-be ]

We understand that this is the only action required to be completed
upon approval of this document.

Note:  The actions requested in this document will not be completed
until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC.
This message is only to confirm what actions will be performed.
2013-06-28
03 Peter Yee Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour
2013-06-28
03 Peter Yee Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour
2013-06-27
03 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Leif Johansson
2013-06-27
03 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Leif Johansson
2013-06-24
03 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2013-06-24
03 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender:
Subject: Last Call:  (A Group Text Chat Purpose for …
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender:
Subject: Last Call:  (A Group Text Chat Purpose for Conference and Service URIs in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Package for Conference State) to Informational RFC


The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'A Group Text Chat Purpose for Conference and Service URIs in the
  Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Package for Conference
  State'
  as Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-07-22. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


  This document defines and registers a value of "grouptextchat"
  ("Group Text Chat") value for the URI  element of SIP's
  Conference Event Package [RFC4575].




The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.


2013-06-24
03 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2013-06-24
03 Gonzalo Camarillo Last call was requested
2013-06-24
03 Gonzalo Camarillo Ballot approval text was generated
2013-06-24
03 Gonzalo Camarillo Ballot writeup was generated
2013-06-24
03 Gonzalo Camarillo State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested
2013-06-24
03 Gonzalo Camarillo Last call announcement was generated
2013-06-24
03 Gonzalo Camarillo Assigned to Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area
2013-06-24
03 Gonzalo Camarillo State Change Notice email list changed to emcho@jitsi.org, draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose@tools.ietf.org, saul@ag-projects.com
2013-06-24
03 Gonzalo Camarillo Intended Status changed to Informational
2013-06-24
03 Gonzalo Camarillo IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2013-06-24
03 Gonzalo Camarillo Changed document writeup
2013-06-18
03 Emil Ivov New version available: draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose-03.txt
2013-06-18
02 Gonzalo Camarillo Shepherding AD changed to Gonzalo Camarillo
2013-06-18
02 Gonzalo Camarillo Stream changed to IETF from None
2013-06-18
02 Gonzalo Camarillo Document shepherd changed to Saul Ibar Corretge
2013-06-18
02 Gonzalo Camarillo Changed document writeup
2013-05-31
02 Emil Ivov New version available: draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose-02.txt
2013-05-28
01 Emil Ivov New version available: draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose-01.txt
2013-04-23
00 Emil Ivov New version available: draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose-00.txt