Neighbor Management Policy for 6LoWPAN
draft-jadhav-lwig-nbr-mgmt-policy-01

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2017-07-23
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats plain text xml pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
LWIG                                                      R. Jadhav, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                                  R. Sahoo
Intended status: Informational                                    Huawei
Expires: January 24, 2018                                   S. Duquennoy
                                                                   Inria
                                                             J. Eriksson
                                                          Yanzi Networks
                                                           July 23, 2017

                 Neighbor Management Policy for 6LoWPAN
                  draft-jadhav-lwig-nbr-mgmt-policy-01

Abstract

   This document describes the problems associated with neighbor cache
   management in constrained multihop networks and a sample neighbor
   management policy to deal with it.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on January 24, 2018.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of

Jadhav, et al.          Expires January 24, 2018                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft   Neighbor Management Policy for 6LoWPAN        July 2017

   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Requirements Language and Terminology . . . . . . . . . .   4
   2.  Neighbor Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     2.1.  Significance of Neighbor management policy  . . . . . . .   5
     2.2.  Trivial neighbor management policies  . . . . . . . . . .   6
     2.3.  Lifecycle of a NCE  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
       2.3.1.  NCE Insertion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
       2.3.2.  NCE Deletion  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
       2.3.3.  NCE Eviction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
         2.3.3.1.  Eviction for directly connected routing entries .  11
       2.3.4.  NCE Reinforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
     2.4.  Requirements of a good neighbor management policy . . . .  12
     2.5.  Approaches to neighbor management policy  . . . . . . . .  12
       2.5.1.  Reactive Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
       2.5.2.  Proactive Approach  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   3.  Reservation based Neighbor Management Policy  . . . . . . . .  14
     3.1.  Limitations of such a policy  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
   4.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
   7.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     7.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     7.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
   Appendix A.  Additional Stuff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17

1.  Introduction

   In a wireless multihop network, the node densities (maximum number of
   devices connected on a single hop) may vary significantly depending
   upon deployments/scenarios.  While there is some policy control
   possible with regards to the network size in terms of maximum number
   of devices connected, it is especially difficult to set a figure on
   what will be the maximum node density given a deployment.  For e.g.
   A network can put an upper limit on max 1000 devices but it is
Show full document text