A Review of Published Criteria for Acceptance Into a Complaint Feedback Loop Program
draft-jdfalk-marf-acceptance-criteria-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | J.D. Falk | ||
| Last updated | 2010-07-04 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
All known Feedback Generators (the operators of complaint feedback loops) have some criteria for acceptance of requests to receive feedback. This document is a review of such criteria, where publicly available. It is intended to inform design decisions within the Mail Abuse Reporting Format (MARF) Working Group [MARF-WG], and likely will never advance beyond internet-draft status. The information included herein was gathered from public web sites.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)