Proposed Plan for Usage of SDP and RTP
draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan-01

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2013-08-29 (latest revision 2013-02-25)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan-01.txt

Abstract

This draft outlines a bunch of the remaining issues in RTCWeb related to how the the W3C APIs map to various usages of RTP and the associated SDP. It proposes one possible solution to that problem and outlines several chunks of work that would need to be put into other drafts or result in new drafts being written. The underlying design guideline is to, as much as possible, re-use what is already defined in existing SDP [RFC4566] and RTP [RFC3550] specifications. This draft is not intended to become an specification but is meant for working group discussion to help build the specifications. It is being discussed on the rtcweb@ietf.org mailing list though it has topics relating to the CLUE WG, MMUSIC WG, AVT* WG, and WebRTC WG at W3C.

Authors

Cullen Jennings (fluffy@iii.ca)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)