%% You should probably cite draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan-01 instead of this revision.
@techreport{jennings-rtcweb-plan-00,
    number =    {draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan/00/},
    author =    {Cullen Fluffy Jennings},
    title =     {{Proposed Plan for Usage of SDP and RTP}},
    pagetotal = 30,
    year =      2013,
    month =     feb,
    day =       18,
    abstract =  {This draft outlines a bunch of the remaining issues in RTCWeb related to how the the W3C APIs map to various usages of RTP and the associated SDP. It proposes one possible solution to that problem and outlines several chunks of work that would need to be put into other drafts or result in new drafts being written. The underlying design guideline is to, as much as possible, re-use what is already defined in existing SDP {[}RFC4566{]} and RTP {[}RFC3550{]} specifications. This draft is not intended to become an specification but is meant for working group discussion to help build the specifications. It is being discussed on the webrtc@ietf.org mailing list though it has topics relating to the CLUE WG, MMUSIC WG, AVT* WG, and WebRTC WG at W3C.},
}