%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag instead of this I-D.
@techreport{jones-cbor-date-tag-00,
    number =    {draft-jones-cbor-date-tag-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jones-cbor-date-tag/00/},
    author =    {Michael B. Jones and Anthony Nadalin},
    title =     {{Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tag for Date}},
    pagetotal = 4,
    year =      2020,
    month =     mar,
    day =       9,
    abstract =  {The Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR, RFC 7049) is a data format whose design goals include the possibility of extremely small code size, fairly small message size, and extensibility without the need for version negotiation. In CBOR, one point of extensibility is the definition of CBOR tags. RFC 7049 defines two tags for time: CBOR tag 0 (RFC 3339 date/time string) and tag 1 (Posix "seconds since the epoch"). Since then, additional requirements have become known. This specification defines a CBOR tag for an RFC 3339 date text string, for applications needing a date representation without a time. It is intended as the reference document for the IANA registration of the CBOR tag defined.},
}