Addition of the Camellia Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)
draft-kanno-tls-camellia-03
Yes
(Sean Turner)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Wesley Eddy)
Abstain
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-04-07)
Unknown
I am entering a "no objection" ballot on the basis of a very light review of a document far outside my area of expertise. I am relying on the shepherding Security AD to have ensured that this document is sound.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-04-13)
Unknown
The IANA Considerations section should be marked as "Please remove this section after filling in the values in section 2." Having the values appear in the document twice is a sure-fire way to introduce an error.
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-04-14)
Unknown
The IPR disclosure for this document includes:
The seller shall provide the buyer with the following written notice:
The use of this product or service is subject to the reasonable,
non-discriminatory terms in the Intellectual Property Rights
(IPR) Disclosure of Certicom Corp. at the IETF for Addition of
Camellia Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)
implemented in the product or service.
I don't recall seeing such a provision in other IPR disclosures. If it
is unusual, in my opinion it should be mentioned explicitly in any
new IETF last call.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-04-11)
Unknown
This document has an IPR disclosure against it, but I do not see this noted in the IETF Last Call notice.
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
Abstain
Abstain
(2011-04-13)
Unknown
I don't find the idea of adding yet another 42 TLS ciphersuites to be useful and to the extent that it complicates life for developers and consumes their time (mostly) needlessly, it's a bad thing. However, I don't think it would be fair to try to hold this at this stage in the game, given that the authors had agreement from previous IESG members. Please also see the secdir review at: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg02584.html that indicates some clarifications may be useful.