Circuit Style Segment Routing Policies with Optimized SID List Depth
draft-karboubi-spring-sidlist-optimized-cs-sr-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Amal Karboubi , Cengiz Alaettinoglu , Himanshu C. Shah , Siva Sivabalan , Todd Defillipi | ||
| Last updated | 2024-12-30 (Latest revision 2024-06-28) | ||
| Replaces | draft-karboubi-spring-sidlist-compressed-cs-sr | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Service providers require delivery of circuit-style transport services in a segment routing based IP network. This document introduces a solution that supports circuit style segment routing policies that allows usage of optimized SID lists (i.e. SID List that may contain non-contiguous node SIDs as instructions) and describes mechanisms that would allow such encoding to still honor all the requirements of the circuit style policies notably traffic engineering and bandwidth requirements.
Authors
Amal Karboubi
Cengiz Alaettinoglu
Himanshu C. Shah
Siva Sivabalan
Todd Defillipi
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)