Skip to main content

Eligibility Concept in Segment Routing Policies
draft-karboubi-spring-sr-policy-eligibility-04

Document Type Replaced Internet-Draft (candidate for spring WG)
Expired & archived
Authors Amal Karboubi , Himanshu Shah , Andrew Stone , Christian Schmutzer , Praveen Maheshwari
Last updated 2025-11-25 (Latest revision 2025-11-21)
Replaced by draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-eligibility
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Additional resources Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state Call For Adoption By WG Issued
Document shepherd (None)
IESG IESG state Replaced by draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-eligibility
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

Segment Routing (SR) introduces new challenges for pinning candidate paths on their intended paths (the path the PCE computed based on provided intent and may have made bandwidth reservations on). The actual path through a network can change or no longer meet the required constraints if a SID list of an SR Policy candidate path is not fully expressed as a list of adjacency SIDs or when a change in the topology does happen. The introduction of the new candidate path eligibility concept permits a path to be signaled and established as operationally up, but controls whether the path is eligible to carry traffic, thus influencing its active state. The eligibility concept allows a system (operator, pce, headend, etc.) to set eligibility as false when path deviations may have occurred, or path constraints are no longer met for one or more SID lists of a candidate path and clear it when candidate path deviations are removed or constraints are met again.

Authors

Amal Karboubi
Himanshu Shah
Andrew Stone
Christian Schmutzer
Praveen Maheshwari

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)