Comparing Proposed Solutions for IPsec Remote Access Legacy User Authentication
draft-kelly-ipsra-eval-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Scott G. Kelly | ||
| Last updated | 2001-07-06 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
A number of competing methods for integrating legacy remote access user authentication into IPsec have been proposed, resulting in confusion as to which method(s) might be best for solving the problems at hand. This document briefly compares these proposals in an effort to clarify the relative standing of each with respect to the problem space and requirements.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)