@techreport{kent-opportunistic-security-01,
    number =    {draft-kent-opportunistic-security-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kent-opportunistic-security/01/},
    author =    {Stephen Kent},
    title =     {{Opportunistic Security as a Countermeasure to Pervasive Monitoring}},
    pagetotal = 14,
    year =      2014,
    month =     apr,
    day =       9,
    abstract =  {This document was prepared as part of the IETF response to concerns about "pervasive monitoring" (PM) as articulated in {[}I-D.farrell-perpass-attack{]}. It begins by describing the current criteria (discussed at the STRINT workshop {[}STRINT{]}) for addressing concerns about PM. It then examines terminology that has been used in IETF standards (and in academic publications) to describe encryption and key management techniques, with a focus on authentication vs. anonymity. Based on this analysis, it propose a new term, "opportunistic security" to describe a goal for IETF security protocols, one countermeasure to pervasive monitoring.},
}