GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for SONET/SDH and OTN OAM Configuration
draft-kern-ccamp-rsvp-te-sdh-otn-oam-ext-02
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Andras Kern , Attila Takacs | ||
| Last updated | 2010-01-28 | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-sdh-otn-oam-ext | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-sdh-otn-oam-ext | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
GMPLS has been extended to support connection establishment in both SONET/SDH [RFC4606] and OTN [RFC4328] networks. However support for the configuration of the supervision functions is not specified. Both SONET/SDH and OTN implement supervision functions to qualify the transported signals. This document defines extensions to RSVP-TE for SONET/SDH and OTN OAM configuration based on the OAM Configuration Framework defined in [GMPLS-OAM-FWK].Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)