SPRING OpenFlow Interworking Use Cases
draft-khc-spring-openflow-interworking-use-cases-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | fangwei hu , Bhumip Khasnabish , Hakki Cankaya | ||
| Last updated | 2015-02-08 (Latest revision 2014-08-07) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This draft discusses interworking (IW) of OpenFlow and Segment routing. Several possible scenarios are introduced in this document. We believe that such discussion and research are helpful for both deployment/implementation and wider acceptance of the segment routing technology.
Authors
fangwei hu
Bhumip Khasnabish
Hakki Cankaya
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)