%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-mpls-lspping-norao instead of this I-D.
@techreport{kompella-mpls-lspping-norao-02,
    number =    {draft-kompella-mpls-lspping-norao-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kompella-mpls-lspping-norao/02/},
    author =    {Kireeti Kompella and Ron Bonica and Greg Mirsky},
    title =     {{Deprecating the Use of Router Alert in LSP Ping}},
    pagetotal = 7,
    year =      2022,
    month =     dec,
    day =       10,
    abstract =  {LSP ping messages (RFC 8029) are encapsulated in IP headers that include a Router Alert Option (RAO). The rationale for including an RAO is questionable. Furthermore, RFC6398 identifies security vulnerabilities associated with the RAO. Therefore, this document removes the RAO from LSP ping message encapsulations. It updates RFCs 7506 and 8029. This document also recommends the use of an IPv6 loopback address (:::1/128) and discourages the use of an IPv4 loopback address mapped to IPv6.},
}