No Further Fast Reroute
draft-kompella-mpls-nffrr-02
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Kireeti Kompella , Wen Lin | ||
| Last updated | 2022-01-13 (Latest revision 2021-07-12) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of
the expired Internet-Draft can be found at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-kompella-mpls-nffrr-02.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-kompella-mpls-nffrr-02.txt
Abstract
There are several cases where, once Fast Reroute has taken place (for MPLS protection), a second fast reroute is undesirable, even detrimental. This memo gives several examples of this, and proposes a mechanism to prevent further fast reroutes.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)