No Further Fast Reroute
draft-kompella-mpls-nffrr-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Kireeti Kompella , Wen Lin | ||
| Last updated | 2020-09-09 (latest revision 2020-03-08) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-kompella-mpls-nffrr-00.txt
Abstract
There are several cases where, once Fast Reroute has taken place (for MPLS protection), a second fast reroute is undesirable, even detrimental. This memo gives several examples of this, and proposes a mechanism to prevent further fast reroutes.
Authors
Kireeti Kompella
(kireeti.kompella@gmail.com)
Wen Lin
(wlin@juniper.net)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)