%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-opsawg-lsn-deployment instead of this I-D.
@techreport{kuarsingh-lsn-deployment-06,
    number =    {draft-kuarsingh-lsn-deployment-06},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kuarsingh-lsn-deployment/06/},
    author =    {Victor Kuarsingh and John Cianfarani},
    title =     {{CGN Deployment with MPLS/VPNs}},
    pagetotal = 18,
    year =      2012,
    month =     feb,
    day =       20,
    abstract =  {This document specifies a framework to integrate a Network Address Translation layer into an operator's network to function as a Carrier Grade NAT (also known as CGN or Large Scale NAT). CGN is a concept also described in {[}I-D.ietf-behave-lsn-requirements{]} and describes the model as a dual layer translation model. Although operators may wish to deploy IPv6 to strategically overcome IPv4 exhaustion, near term needs may not be satisfied with an IPv6 deployment alone. This document provides a practical integration model which allows CGN to be integrated into the network meeting the connectivity needs of the customer while being mindful of not disrupting existing services and meeting the technical challenges that CGN brings. The model includes the use of MPLS/VPNs defined in {[}RFC4364{]} as a tool to achieve this goal. This document does not intend to defend the merits of CGN.},
}