Considerations Regarding Third-Party Reputation Services
draft-kucherawy-repute-consid-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Murray Kucherawy | ||
| Last updated | 2014-05-31 (Latest revision 2013-11-27) | ||
| Replaces | draft-ietf-repute-considerations | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Reputation services offer quality assessments about likely future behavior, based on past behaviors. The use of these services has become a common tool in many applications that seek to apply collected intelligence about traffic sources. Often this is done because it is common or even expected operator practice. It is therefore important to be aware of a number of considerations for both operators and consumers of the data. This document includes a collection of the best advice available regarding providers and consumers of reputation data, based on experience to date. Much of this is based on experience with email reputation systems, but the concepts are generally applicable.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)