%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts instead of this I-D. @techreport{kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02, number = {draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts/02/}, author = {Kenji Kumaki}, title = {{Interworking Requirements to Support operation of MPLS-TE over GMPLS networks}}, pagetotal = 12, year = 2006, month = oct, day = 25, abstract = {This document describes a framework and Service Provider requirements for operating Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) traffic engineering (TE) networks over Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) networks. Operation of an MPLS-TE network as a client network to a GMPLS network has enhanced operational capabilities than provided by a co- existent protocol model (ships in the night). The GMPLS network may be a packet or a non-packet network, and may itself be a multi-layer network supporting both packet and non-packet technologies. A MPLS-TE Label Switched Path (LSP) originates and terminates on an MPLS Label Switching Router (LSR). The GMPLS network provides transparent transport for the end-to-end MPLS-TE LSP. Specification of solutions is out of scope for this document.}, }