The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set
draft-kunze-rfc2413bis-07
Yes
(Lisa Dusseault)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Kessens)
(David Ward)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Tim Polk)
No Record
(Cullen Jennings)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Chris Newman Former IESG member
(was No Objection)
Yes
Yes
(2007-05-10)
Unknown
The inclusion of a language attribute makes this comply with section 4 of RFC 2277 / BCP 18. Section 3 of RFC 2277 / BCP 18 doesn't apply because this is too high level to discuss charsets (it describes meta information without describing the encoding of that information when it is applied to a specific protocol context). When this is mapped to vanilla XML or XHTML, for example, it would need to comply with the XML charset requirements (support for both UTF-8 and UTF-16). When used in an IETF protocol, we would expect support for UTF-8. It also uses an international date format, although the syntax is somewhat more liberal than RFC 3339. The more liberal syntax is suitable for such a high level document as the accuracy necessary for RFC 3339 format may not be available in this context. I conclude this complies with our internationalization and date-time requirements.
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Ward Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-05-07)
Unknown
agree with Russ' comment - the wording should be changed
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-05-07)
Unknown
This document is intended for publication as an Informational RFC. It is not an IETF standards-track document. I wonder if we are going to confuse the reader by using the word "standard" when this document refers to itself. - Section 2: The fifteen element "Dublin Core" described in this standard ... - Section 3: The elements described in this standard ... - Section 3: ... implementation detail is outside the scope of this standard. - Appendix A: This appendix is not part of the standard. - Appendix B: This appendix is not part of the standard.
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Record
No Record
()
Unknown