Multihoming in IPv6 by multiple announcements of longer prefixes
draft-kurtis-multihoming-longprefix-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Kurt Erik Lindqvist | ||
| Last updated | 2003-01-10 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
In the current IP version 4 Internet, many organizations that are not Internet Service Providers are still getting their Internet connectivity through multiple providers by having address space that are announced via multiple paths. This is commonly referred to as multihoming. For the IP version 6 Internet, there have long been a debate as to how to achieve the same effect. This document addresses these issues by highlighting some of the current policies and how these can be used to achive multihoming for IP version 6 connected networks.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)