%% You should probably cite draft-kyzivat-siprec-conference-use-cases-02 instead of this revision.
@techreport{kyzivat-siprec-conference-use-cases-01,
    number =    {draft-kyzivat-siprec-conference-use-cases-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kyzivat-siprec-conference-use-cases/01/},
    author =    {Paul Kyzivat and Michael Yan and Simon Pietro Romano},
    title =     {{Multimedia Conference Recording Use Cases and Requirements}},
    pagetotal = 10,
    year =      2014,
    month =     feb,
    day =       12,
    abstract =  {The current work of SIPREC will soon finish. As conferences are the key requirement for some environments, it is worth to explore several extensions and additional functionality to support multimedia conference recording. SIPREC is not sufficient to record all the conference sessions via certain interactive media channels, like multi-user chat or screen sharing. This draft tries to show the use cases for multimedia conference recording and the requirements for how to work well under SIPREC mechanism. The requirements ask for extensions to SIP that will manage delivery of RTP media sessions, including content media defined by {[}RFC4796{]} , and MSRP media sessions to a recording device. The recorded media sessions are all SIP-based.},
}