(Dual Stack) Mobile IPv6 Implementation with unmodified IPsec
draft-laganier-mext-dsmipv6-ipsec-01
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Julien Laganier | ||
| Last updated | 2009-10-26 | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
html
xml
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of
the expired Internet-Draft can be found at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-laganier-mext-dsmipv6-ipsec-01.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-laganier-mext-dsmipv6-ipsec-01.txt
Abstract
It's been argued in the past and in some documents, such as RFC 3776, RFC 4877 and RFC 5555, that an IPsec implementation needs to be modified to afford security services to MIPv6 and DSMIPv6. This document shows that it is possible to implement MIPv6 and DSMIPv6 in a way that does not require change to a native or Bump-in-the-stack (BITS) IPsec implementation conformant to RFC 4301.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)