NAT and other Network 'Intelligence': Clearing Architectural Haze through the use of Fog Lamps
draft-lear-foglamps-03
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2000-04-14 | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of
the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lear-foglamps-03.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lear-foglamps-03.txt
Abstract
In their workshop report the IAB once again sets forth its opinion on the use and impact of NAT devices, along with the complications of private network address space.[1,2,3] Therein they discuss the notion of 'transparency'. In this brief document we offer an alternative idea, and suggest its further study: device visibility.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)