Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): The Binary Encoding Option
draft-legg-ldap-binary-04
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-22
|
04 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Brian Carpenter |
2012-08-22
|
04 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley |
2006-02-06
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2006-01-31
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2006-01-31
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2006-01-31
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2006-01-30
|
04 | Ted Hardie | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Ted Hardie |
2006-01-30
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley |
2006-01-30
|
04 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2006-01-30
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-legg-ldap-binary-04.txt |
2005-11-30
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot discuss] Section 4 says: > > These syntaxes also have an additional requirement that the exact > BER encoding must be … [Ballot discuss] Section 4 says: > > These syntaxes also have an additional requirement that the exact > BER encoding must be preserved. Note that this is a property of > the syntaxes themselves, and not a property of the binary option. > The digitally signed objects really need DER encoding. Since DER is a proper subset of BER, this text is correct. The reader might be better served knowing that preservation of the DER means that the LDAP client will not have to perform BER-decode and then DER-encode in order to validate the digital signature. |
2005-11-01
|
04 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Carpenter has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Brian Carpenter |
2005-10-28
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2005-10-28
|
04 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-10-27 |
2005-10-27
|
04 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot discuss] However, except for the case of certain attribute syntaxes whose values are required to BER encoded, no attempt is made here to … [Ballot discuss] However, except for the case of certain attribute syntaxes whose values are required to BER encoded, no attempt is made here to eliminate the known consistency problems. Rather the focus is on capturing current behaviours. A more thorough solution is left for a future specification. This is a strange statement in a PS. Can it be rewritten to make it clear that these are known *implementation* consistency problems? |
2005-10-27
|
04 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter |
2005-10-27
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Margaret Wasserman has been changed to Undefined from No Objection by Margaret Wasserman |
2005-10-27
|
04 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
2005-10-27
|
04 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2005-10-27
|
04 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin |
2005-10-27
|
04 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
2005-10-26
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
2005-10-26
|
04 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Comments: Upon approval of this document the IANA will update the reference for the parameter registration "binary" found at the following registry: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ldap-parameters |
2005-10-25
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot discuss] The Abstract and Introduction need to indicate that this document updates [SYNTAX]. Section 4 says: > > These syntaxes … [Ballot discuss] The Abstract and Introduction need to indicate that this document updates [SYNTAX]. Section 4 says: > > These syntaxes also have an additional requirement that the exact > BER encoding must be preserved. Note that this is a property of > the syntaxes themselves, and not a property of the binary option. > The digitally signed objects really need DER encoding. Since DER is a proper subset of BER, this text is correct. The reader might be better served knowing that preservation of the DER means that the LDAP client will not have to perform BER-decode and then DER-encode in order to validate the digital signature. |
2005-10-25
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
2005-10-25
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
2005-10-24
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
2005-10-20
|
04 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ted Hardie |
2005-10-20
|
04 | Ted Hardie | Ballot has been issued by Ted Hardie |
2005-10-20
|
04 | Ted Hardie | Created "Approve" ballot |
2005-10-20
|
04 | Ted Hardie | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-10-27 by Ted Hardie |
2005-10-20
|
04 | Ted Hardie | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Ted Hardie |
2005-09-20
|
04 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system |
2005-08-23
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2005-08-23
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2005-08-23
|
04 | Ted Hardie | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Ted Hardie |
2005-08-23
|
04 | Ted Hardie | Last Call was requested by Ted Hardie |
2005-08-23
|
04 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2005-08-23
|
04 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2005-08-23
|
04 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2005-08-03
|
04 | Ted Hardie | Draft Added by Ted Hardie in state Publication Requested |
2005-06-07
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-legg-ldap-binary-03.txt |
2005-03-11
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-legg-ldap-binary-02.txt |
2004-06-16
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-legg-ldap-binary-01.txt |
2003-06-19
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-legg-ldap-binary-00.txt |