%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass instead of this I-D.
@techreport{leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-01,
    number =    {draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass/01/},
    author =    {Jean-Louis Le Roux},
    title =     {{P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels}},
    pagetotal = 11,
    year =      2007,
    month =     mar,
    day =       7,
    abstract =  {This document defines procedures for fast reroute protection of Point-To-MultiPoint (P2MP) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE-LSP) in MultiProtocol Label Switching (MPLS) networks, based upon Point-To-MultiPoint bypass tunnels. The motivation for using P2MP bypass tunnels is to avoid potentially expensive data duplication along the backup path that could occur if point-to-point bypass tunnels where used, i.e. to optimize the bandwidth usage, during fast reroute protection of a link or a node. During link or node failure the traffic carried onto a protected P2MP TE-LSP is tunnelled within one or several P2MP bypass tunnels towards a set of Merge Points. To avoid data duplication backup labels (i.e. inner labels) are assigned by the Point of Local Repair (PLR) following the RSVP-TE upstream label assignment procedure.},
}