Overview of Existing Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks
draft-levis-roll-protocols-survey-02
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Arsalan Tavakoli , Stephen Dawson-Haggerty | ||
Last updated | 2009-12-14 (Latest revision 2008-08-08) | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-roll-protocols-survey | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-roll-protocols-survey | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Networks of low power wireless devices introduce novel IP routing issues. Low-power wireless devices, such as sensors, actuators and smart objects, have difficult constraints: very limited memory, little processing power, and long sleep periods. As most of these devices are battery-powered, energy efficiency is critically important. Wireless link qualities can vary significantly over time, requiring protocols to make agile decisions yet minimize topology change energy costs. Routing over such low power and lossy networks has requirements that existing mesh protocols only partially address. This document provides a brief survey of the strengths and weaknesses of existing protocols with respect to this class of networks. It provides guidance on how lessons from existing and prior efforts can be leveraged in future protocol design.
Authors
Arsalan Tavakoli
Stephen Dawson-Haggerty
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)