Data Channel Status Confirmation Extensions for the Link Management Protocol
draft-li-ccamp-confirm-data-channel-status-03
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Dan Li , Huiying Xu , Fatai Zhang , Snigdho Bardalai , Julien Meuric , Diego Caviglia | ||
| Last updated | 2009-04-28 (Latest revision 2008-02-21) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-ccamp-confirm-data-channel-status | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-ccamp-confirm-data-channel-status | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document defines simple additions to the Link Management Protocol (LMP) to provide a control plane tool that can assist in the location of stranded resources by allowing adjacent LSRs to confirm Li Expires August 2008 [page 1] draft-li-ccamp-confirm-data-channel-status-03.txt February 2008 data channel statuses, and provides triggers for notifying the management plane if any discrepancies are found. Conventions used in this document The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Authors
Dan Li
Huiying Xu
Fatai Zhang
Snigdho Bardalai
Julien Meuric
Diego Caviglia
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)