Area Proxy for IS-IS
draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-07
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(lsr WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Tony Li , Sarah Chen , Vivek Ilangovan , Gyan Mishra | ||
| Last updated | 2020-06-29 (Latest revision 2020-06-23) | ||
| Replaces | draft-li-lsr-isis-area-abstraction | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Adopted by a WG | |
| Document shepherd | Acee Lindem | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com> |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Link state routing protocols have hierarchical abstraction already built into them. However, when lower levels are used for transit, they must expose their internal topologies to each other, leading to scale issues. To avoid this, this document discusses extensions to the IS-IS routing protocol that would allow level 1 areas to provide transit, yet only inject an abstraction of the level 1 topology into level 2. Each level 1 area is represented as a single level 2 node, thereby enabling greater scale.
Authors
Tony Li
Sarah Chen
Vivek Ilangovan
Gyan Mishra
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)