%% You should probably cite draft-li-rtgwg-enhanced-ti-lfa-09 instead of this revision.
@techreport{li-rtgwg-enhanced-ti-lfa-05,
    number =    {draft-li-rtgwg-enhanced-ti-lfa-05},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-rtgwg-enhanced-ti-lfa/05/},
    author =    {Cheng Li and Zhibo Hu and Yongqing Zhu and Shraddha Hegde},
    title =     {{Enhanced Topology Independent Loop-free Alternate Fast Re-route}},
    pagetotal = 12,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {Topology Independent Loop-free Alternate Fast Re-route (TI-LFA) aims at providing protection of node and adjacency segments within the Segment Routing (SR) framework. A key aspect of TI-LFA is the FRR path selection approach establishing protection over the expected post-convergence paths from the point of local repair. However, the TI-LFA FRR path may skip the node even if it is specified in the SID list to be traveled. This document defines Enhanced TI-LFA(TI-LFA+) by adding a No-bypass indicator for segments to ensure that the FRR route will not bypass the specific node, such as firewall. Also, this document defines No- bypass flag and No-FRR flag in SRH to indicate not to bypass nodes and not to perform FRR on all the nodes along the SRv6 path, respectively.},
}