@techreport{li-rttp-iqa-addressing-00,
    number =    {draft-li-rttp-iqa-addressing-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-rttp-iqa-addressing/00/},
    author =    {ShaoBao Li},
    title =     {{The rttp and iqa URI Schemes: Derived-Address Intent and Attestation Addressing}},
    pagetotal = 16,
    year =      2026,
    month =     sep,
    day =       24,
    abstract =  {This document specifies two companion URI schemes built on one shared addressing model, in which the address of a subject is derived by computation from the authority and no lookup service, registry, or name-resolution system is consulted when the URI is used. The "rttp" scheme names a claim of intent directed at an identified subject; the "iqa" scheme names the attestation standing of an identified subject, as reported by one of three named organs, and carries no proof and no credential. The two are deliberately paired: intent addressing carries what is claimed, attestation carries whether the claimant is verified. Both schemes parse fail-closed, and the document states the requirements a client MUST satisfy when it handles such URIs, to avoid the failure modes that short, user-embeddable strings invite: using the authority as a navigation target (open redirect), using a registered handler as a general-purpose launcher, and, for "iqa", a parse that looks like a certification. This document is not an Internet Standard. It is an Informational specification of two experimental addressing schemes, published for the public record.},
}