@techreport{li-sava-intra-domain-use-cases-00,
    number =    {draft-li-sava-intra-domain-use-cases-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-sava-intra-domain-use-cases/00/},
    author =    {Dan Li and Jianping Wu and Yunan Gu and Lancheng Qin and Tao Lin},
    title =     {{Soure Address Validation Architecture (SAVA): Intra-domain Use Cases}},
    pagetotal = 15,
    year =      2020,
    month =     jul,
    day =       13,
    abstract =  {This document identifies scenarios where existing approaches for detection and mitigation of source address spoofing don't perform perfectly. Either Ingress ACL filtering {[}RFC3704{]}, unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) {[}RFC3704{]}, feasible path uRPF {[}RFC 3704{]}, or Enhanced Feasible-Path uRPF {[}RFC8704{]} has limitations regarding eihter automated implemetation objective or detection accuracy objective (0\% false positive and 0\% false negative). This document identifies two such scenarios and provides solution discussions.},
}