%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-ospf-flowspec-extensions instead of this I-D.
@techreport{liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-00,
	number =	{draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-00},
	type =		{Internet-Draft},
	institution =	{Internet Engineering Task Force},
	publisher =	{Internet Engineering Task Force},
	note =		{Work in Progress},
	url =		{https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-00},
        author =	{Qiandeng Liang and Jianjie You},
	title =		{{OSPF Extensions for Flow Specification}},
	pagetotal =	10,
	year =		,
	month =		,
	day =		,
	abstract =	{This document defines a new OSPF flow specification (FlowSpec) Opaque Link State Advertisement (LSA) encoding format that can be used to distribute traffic flow specifications. Additionally, this document proposes to assign label for the FlowSpec route in order to generate one or more LSPs, which would improve the route lookup performance in the data plane. For the network not deploying BGP or the internal nodes in an AS, it is expected to extend IGP (Interior Gateway Protocol ) to distribute FlowSpec routes. One application is to mitigate denial-of-service attacks as close to the attacker as possible, the other is to generate LSPs for the FlowSpec routes in the network.},
}