%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras instead of this I-D.
@techreport{linkova-v6ops-conditional-ras-00,
    number =    {draft-linkova-v6ops-conditional-ras-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-linkova-v6ops-conditional-ras/00/},
    author =    {Jen Linkova},
    title =     {{Using Conditional Router Advertisements for Enterprise Multihoming}},
    pagetotal = 13,
    year =      2017,
    month =     jun,
    day =       15,
    abstract =  {This document discusses most common scenarios of connecting an enterprise network to multiple ISPs using provider aggregatable address space (PA). The problem of enterprise multihoming without address translation of any form has not been solved yet as it requires both the network to select the correct egress ISP based on the packet source address and hosts to select the correct source address based on the desired egress ISP for that traffic. {[}I-D.ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming{]} proposes a solution to this problem by introducing a new routing functionality (Source Address Dependent Routing) to solve the uplink selection issue and using Router Advertisements to influence the host source address selection. While the above-mentioned document focus is on solving the general problem and to cover various complex use cases, this document describes how the solution proposed in {[}I-D.ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming{]} can be adopted for limited number of common use cases. In particular the focus is on scenarios when a enterprise network has two Internet uplinks used either in primary/backup mode or simultaniously and hosts in that network might not yet properly support multihoming as described in {[}RFC8028{]}.},
}