%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-idr-rtc-interas instead of this I-D.
@techreport{litkowski-idr-rtc-interas-04,
    number =    {draft-litkowski-idr-rtc-interas-04},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-idr-rtc-interas/04/},
    author =    {Stephane Litkowski and Jeffrey Haas and Keyur Patel},
    title =     {{Inter Domain considerations for Constrained Route distribution}},
    pagetotal = 8,
    year =      2026,
    month =     may,
    day =       29,
    abstract =  {RFC4684 defines Multi-Protocol BGP (MP-BGP) procedures that allow BGP speakers to exchange Route Target reachability information in order to limit the propagation of Virtual Private Networks (VPN) Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI). RFC4684 addresses both intra domain and inter domain distributions. Operational deployment experience shows that the current distribution model defined in RFC4684 for inter domain may cause some issue in specific scenarios. This document proposes alternate route distribution rules for inter domain in order to address these specific scenarios.},
}