Interactions between LFA and RSVP-TE
draft-litkowski-rtgwg-lfa-rsvpte-cooperation-02
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Stephane Litkowski , Bruno Decraene , Clarence Filsfils , Syed Kamran Raza | ||
| Last updated | 2014-03-03 (Latest revision 2013-08-19) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document defines the behavior of a node supporting Loopfree Alternates (LFA) when the node has established RSVP TE tunnels. It first describes the decisions to be made by the LFA mechanism with respect to the use of TE tunnels as LFA candidates. Second, it discusses the use of RSVP TE tunnels as a way to complement the LFA coverage, illustrating how these technologies can benefit from each other.
Authors
Stephane Litkowski
Bruno Decraene
Clarence Filsfils
Syed Kamran Raza
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)