Link State protocols SPF trigger and delay algorithm impact on IGP microloops
draft-litkowski-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-02
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Stephane Litkowski | ||
| Last updated | 2015-03-06 | ||
| Replaced by | RFC 8541 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews |
RTGDIR Early review
Has Issues
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
A micro-loop is a packet forwarding loop that may occur transiently among two or more routers in a hop-by-hop packet forwarding paradigm. In this document, we are trying to analyze the impact of using different Link State IGP implementations in a single network in regards of microloops. The analysis is focused on the SPF triggers and SPF delay algorithm.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)